[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150520.120340.894954416645925582.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 12:03:40 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: mkubecek@...e.cz
Cc: nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru,
jmorris@...ei.org, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, kaber@...sh.net,
roopa@...ulusnetworks.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3 0/2] IPv6 ECMP route add/replace fixes
From: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 20:53:50 +0200 (CEST)
> (1) When adding a nexthop of a multipath route fails (e.g. because of a
> conflict with an existing route), we are supposed to delete nexthops
> already added. However, currently we try to also delete all nexthops we
> haven't even tried to add yet so that a "ip route add" command can
> actually remove pre-existing routes if it fails.
>
> (2) Attempt to replace a multipath route results in a broken siblings
> linked list. Following commands (like "ip route del") can then either
> follow a link into freed memory or end in an infinite loop (if the slab
> object has been reused).
>
> v2: fix an omission in first patch
>
> v3: change the semantics of replace operation to better match IPv4
Series applied, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists