[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150521054101.GA15037@localhost>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 08:41:02 +0300
From: Petko Manolov <petkan@...-labs.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@...onical.com>,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...e.com>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, james.l.morris@...cle.com,
serge@...lyn.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Kyle McMartin <kyle@...nel.org>,
David Woodhouse <david.woodhouse@...el.com>,
Joey Lee <jlee@...e.de>, Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, mricon@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [RFD] linux-firmware key arrangement for firmware signing
On 15-05-20 21:41:04, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 07:46:13PM +0300, Petko Manolov wrote:
> > On 15-05-20 17:24:46, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
> > >
> > > More to the point why do you want to sign firmware files ? Leaving aside the
> > > fact that someone will produce a device with GPLv3 firmware just to p*ss you
> > > off there's the rather more relevant fact that firmware for devices on a so
> > > called "trusted" platform already have signed firmware.
> >
> > For "trusted" systems one would like to make sure everything that goes in has
> > known provenance. Maybe this was the idea?
>
> If so, then just do what people do today, verify their known valid disk image
> before mounting it and then they know they can trust the data on it to be use
> for whatever (including firmware.) No kernel changes needed, distro support
> is already there for this.
I do agree, the infrastructure is already in place. The project i am working on
has very strict security requirements, quite unlike regular Linux box. I was
pleasantly surprised that it didn't take much kernel hacking to get to the point
where stuff is working to our liking.
> I too don't understand this need to sign something that you don't really know
> what it is from some other company, just to send it to a separate device that
> is going to do whatever it wants with it if it is signed or not.
This is not the point. What you need to know is _where_ the firmware came from,
not _what_ it does once it reach your system. If you don't care about such
things, just ignore the signature. :)
Petko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists