[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150521073741.GE11112@norris-Latitude-E6410>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 00:37:41 -0700
From: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
To: Wenlin Kang <wenlin.kang@...driver.com>
Cc: linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, dwmw2@...radead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: blktrans: change blktrans_getgeo rerurn value
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 02:49:38PM +0800, Wenlin Kang wrote:
> On 2015年05月21日 03:47, nick wrote:
> >On 2015-05-20 03:33 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
> >>On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 02:29:16PM +0800, Wenlin Kang wrote:
> >>>Modify function blktrans_getgeo()'s return value to -ENXIO when
> >>>dev->tr->getgeo == NULL.
> >>>
> >>>We shouldn't make the return value to 0 when dev->tr->getgeo == NULL,
> >>>because the function blktrans_getgeo() has an output value "hd_geometry"
> >>>which is usually used by some application, if return 0, it will make some
> >>>application get the wrong information.
> >>>
> >>>Signed-off-by: Wenlin Kang <wenlin.kang@...driver.com>
> >>>---
> >>> drivers/mtd/mtd_blkdevs.c | 2 +-
> >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>
> >>>diff --git a/drivers/mtd/mtd_blkdevs.c b/drivers/mtd/mtd_blkdevs.c
> >>>index 2b0c5287..f8bb16e 100644
> >>>--- a/drivers/mtd/mtd_blkdevs.c
> >>>+++ b/drivers/mtd/mtd_blkdevs.c
> >>>@@ -273,7 +273,7 @@ static int blktrans_getgeo(struct block_device *bdev, struct hd_geometry *geo)
> >>> if (!dev->mtd)
> >>> goto unlock;
> >>>- ret = dev->tr->getgeo ? dev->tr->getgeo(dev, geo) : 0;
> >>>+ ret = dev->tr->getgeo ? dev->tr->getgeo(dev, geo) : -ENXIO;
> >>Good catch. I don't think ENXIO is correct in this case, though. Maybe
> >>-EOPNOTSUPP or -ENOSYS? The latter might make more sense I guess.
> >>
> >I would recommend -EOPNOTSUPP as this as nothing to do with unimplemented
> >functions or hardware support. This is just unsupported due to the value
> >being NULL and therefore the hardware support is not there.
> >Just My Option,
> >Nick
>
> As you said, -EOPNOTSUPP might be better,thanks.
Nick's opinion is irrelevant here:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/8/4/206
> I have remade the patch and attached it, would you please check it
> again? thanks.
Please send patches inline (e.g., via git-send-email), not as
attachments. But this is pretty trivial, and it's what I already tested.
So, applied to l2-mtd.git.
Brian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists