[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <555D95C0.10104@windriver.com>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 16:22:24 +0800
From: Wenlin Kang <wenlin.kang@...driver.com>
To: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
CC: "linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: blktrans: change blktrans_getgeo rerurn value
On 2015年05月21日 16:05, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 09:56:21AM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 9:33 PM, Brian Norris
>> <computersforpeace@...il.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 02:29:16PM +0800, Wenlin Kang wrote:
>>>> Modify function blktrans_getgeo()'s return value to -ENXIO when
>>>> dev->tr->getgeo == NULL.
>>>>
>>>> We shouldn't make the return value to 0 when dev->tr->getgeo == NULL,
>>>> because the function blktrans_getgeo() has an output value "hd_geometry"
>>>> which is usually used by some application, if return 0, it will make some
>>>> application get the wrong information.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Wenlin Kang <wenlin.kang@...driver.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/mtd/mtd_blkdevs.c | 2 +-
>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/mtd_blkdevs.c b/drivers/mtd/mtd_blkdevs.c
>>>> index 2b0c5287..f8bb16e 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/mtd/mtd_blkdevs.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/mtd_blkdevs.c
>>>> @@ -273,7 +273,7 @@ static int blktrans_getgeo(struct block_device *bdev, struct hd_geometry *geo)
>>>> if (!dev->mtd)
>>>> goto unlock;
>>>>
>>>> - ret = dev->tr->getgeo ? dev->tr->getgeo(dev, geo) : 0;
>>>> + ret = dev->tr->getgeo ? dev->tr->getgeo(dev, geo) : -ENXIO;
>>> Good catch. I don't think ENXIO is correct in this case, though. Maybe
>>> -EOPNOTSUPP or -ENOSYS? The latter might make more sense I guess.
>> I'd vote for -ENOTTY as this is what HDIO_GETGEIO returns
>> if the function is not implemented and blktrans_getgeo()
>> is only a wrapper around that.
> I suppose that makes more sense.
>
>> See https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/ioctl/hdio.txt
> But this only mentions EINVAL...
>
>> and block/ioctl.c.
> Anyway, I pushed EOPNOTSUPP, but I can fix that up if we agree.
>
> Brian
>
>
Hi Brian
I just read block/compat_ioctl.c, in that I found the follow,
51 static int compat_hdio_getgeo(struct gendisk *disk, struct
block_device *bdev,
52 struct compat_hd_geometry __user *ugeo)
53 {
54 struct hd_geometry geo;
55 int ret;
56
57 if (!ugeo)
58 return -EINVAL;
59 if (!disk->fops->getgeo)
60 return -ENOTTY;
So, as Richard said, -ENOTTY should also be OK, and before last
commit(048d87199566663e4edc4880df3703c04bcf41d9), it's -ENOTTY, so I
think you can modify it,
or let know whether I need to resent it again.
--
Thanks,
Wenlin Kang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists