linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the samsung tree with the arm-soc and at91 trees

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 21 May 2015 10:20:43 +0900
From:	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
To:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
	Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il>,
	Linux-Next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@...com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the samsung tree with the arm-soc and
 at91 trees

2015-05-20 18:47 GMT+09:00 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>:
> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Alexandre Belloni
> <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com> wrote:
>> On 20/05/2015 at 09:35:36 +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote :
>>> 2015-05-20 9:27 GMT+09:00 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>:
>>> > Today's linux-next merge of the samsung tree got a conflict in
>>> > arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig between various commits from the
>>> > arm-soc and at91 trees and various commits from the samsung tree.
>>> >
>>> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
>>> > is required).
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the merge.
>>>
>>> The parts coming from samsung-soc related to manually toggling stuff
>>> (by me and Javier) look fine. The rest (coming from Kukjin's
>>> savedefconfig) I don't know - too much of them.
>>>
>>
>> Hum, last time I asked, we were not supposed to do a savedefconfig on
>> multi_v7...
>
> Yeah, IMHO it's something the arm-soc maintainers should do only right
> after rc1.
>
> Doing it at any other point in time may remove options that have just been
> added to multi_v7_defconfig by an arm-soc submaintainer, and that depend on
> a Kconfig change queued in another maintainer's for-next branch.

It also depends on which tree and branch the savedefconfig was
performed. If on Linus' master then probably it is not a good idea at
any time.

> Personally, I think no arm-soc submaintainer should touch multi_v7_defconfig,
> and all changes should be applied by the arm-soc maintainers.

Actually Arnd suggested this:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/5/15/303
[PATCH 0/9] multi_v7_defconfig: Enable options for Exynos Chromebooks

Best regards,
Krzysztof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/