linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Documentation: dt: mtd: replace "nor-jedec" binding with "jedec,spi-nor"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMuHMdWW2mOHqOZ9dnMHU+9vYZK+X5Ns0ciBEQGzOKM6_XXE=A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 21 May 2015 10:58:01 +0200
From:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:	Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>
Cc:	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
	"linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>,
	linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: dt: mtd: replace "nor-jedec" binding with "jedec,spi-nor"

Hi Rafal,

On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com> wrote:
>>>> I think your comments suggest that I shouldn't be removing "spi-nor"
>>>> from m25p_ids[] nor from this block:
>>>>
>>>>         if (data && data->type)
>>>>                 flash_name = data->type;
>>>>         else if (!strcmp(spi->modalias, "spi-nor"))
>>>>                 flash_name = NULL; /* auto-detect */
>>>>         else
>>>>                 flash_name = spi->modalias;
>>>>
>>>> So it stays in both m25p_ids[] and .of_match_table.
>>>>
>>>> I suppose that can work. It then allows people to do weird stuff like:
>>>>
>>>>         compatible = "idontknowwhatimdoing,spi-nor";
>>>>
>>>> in their device tree. But other than that, there's not much downside I don't
>>>> think.
>>>
>>> It sounds like a reasonable solution. I guess there isn't a perfect
>>> one. Even if we decide to go for sth like "jedec-spi-nor", there
>>> always will be a chance of someone using
>>> compatible = "idontknowwhatimdoing,jedec-spi-nor";
>>> So if you rework your patch to leave "spi-nor" support in m25p_ids and
>>> conditions block, it should be OK.
>>
>> Typically platform devices just use the driver's name. Hence IMHO there's
>> no need to add a shiny new spi-nor device name.
>>
>> So what's wrong with using "m25p80", and treating that as auto-detect iff
>> !spi->dev.of_node?
>
> Treating "m25p80" as auto-detect triggering string won't allow
> platform to *force* "m25p80" flash type if there ever appears to be
> needed. Maybe it's unlikely, but it still sounds like a bit bad design
> for me.

To force m25p80 flash, you set flash_platform_data.type to "m25p80"?

>> Non-autodetect platform_devices use flash_platform_data.type anyway,
>> and thus fall under the first "if" clause above, don't they?
>
> They do, but I don't see the point.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/