linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] Watchdog: introduce "pretimeout" into framework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <555D9FA8.9060106@roeck-us.net>
Date:	Thu, 21 May 2015 02:04:40 -0700
From:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:	fu.wei@...aro.org, Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com,
	linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
CC:	tekkamanninja@...il.com, graeme.gregory@...aro.org,
	al.stone@...aro.org, hanjun.guo@...aro.org, timur@...eaurora.org,
	ashwin.chaugule@...aro.org, arnd@...db.de, vgandhi@...eaurora.org,
	wim@...ana.be, jcm@...hat.com, leo.duran@....com, corbet@....net,
	mark.rutland@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] Watchdog: introduce "pretimeout" into framework

On 05/21/2015 01:32 AM, fu.wei@...aro.org wrote:
> From: Fu Wei <fu.wei@...aro.org>
>
> Also update Documentation/watchdog/watchdog-kernel-api.txt to
> introduce:
> (1)the new elements in the watchdog_device and watchdog_ops struct;
> (2)the new API "watchdog_init_timeouts".
>
> Reasons:
> (1)kernel already has two watchdog drivers are using "pretimeout":
> 	drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_watchdog.c
> 	drivers/watchdog/kempld_wdt.c(but the definition is different)
> (2)some other dirvers are going to use this: ARM SBSA Generic Watchdog
>
> Signed-off-by: Fu Wei <fu.wei@...aro.org>
> ---

[ ... ]

> +extern int watchdog_init_timeouts(struct watchdog_device *wdd,
> +                                  unsigned int pretimeout_parm,
> +                                  unsigned int timeout_parm,
> +                                  void (*update_limits)(struct watchdog_device *),
> +                                  struct device *dev);
>
> -The watchdog_init_timeout function allows you to initialize the timeout field
> -using the module timeout parameter or by retrieving the timeout-sec property from
> -the device tree (if the module timeout parameter is invalid). Best practice is
> -to set the default timeout value as timeout value in the watchdog_device and
> -then use this function to set the user "preferred" timeout value.
> +The watchdog_init_timeouts function allows you to initialize the pretimeout and
> +timeout fields using the module pretimeout and timeout parameter or by
> +retrieving the elements in the timeout-sec property(the first element is for
> +timeout, the second one is for pretimeout) from the device tree(if the module
> +pretimeout and timeout parameter are invalid).
> +Normally, the pretimeout value will affect the limitation of timeout, and it
> +is also hardware related. So you can write a function in your driver to update
> +the limitation of timeout, according to the pretimeout value. Then pass the
> +function pointer by the update_limits parameter. If you driver doesn't
> +need this adjustment, just pass NULL to the update_limits parameter.

You've lost me a bit with the update_limits function. watchdog_init_timeouts()
is called from the driver. Why should the function have to call back into the
driver to update the parameters which are passed from the driver ?
Seems to me the driver can do that calculation first, then call
watchdog_init_timeouts() with the result. Am I missing something ?

Thanks,
Guenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/