[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2ddf1a3a6386cf4bb692b7a202346910@agner.ch>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 11:27:48 +0200
From: Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
To: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
arnd@...db.de
Cc: linux@....linux.org.uk, manabian@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com,
olof@...om.net, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH defconfig] ARM: add ARM_SINGLE_ARMV7M in ARMv7-M defconfigs
On 2015-05-21 10:26, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 12:38:21AM +0200, Stefan Agner wrote:
>> Select ARM_SINGLE_ARMV7M in defconfigs of the converted ARMv7-M
>> platforms.
> I assume this relates to your series that introduces this symbol. Should
> the defconfig update happen before? (Or what is the result if
> CONFIG_ARM_SINGLE_ARMV7M=y is missing in the defconfig while the symbol
> already exists?) Maybe this should be squashed into the commit in
> question?
The Kconfig system defaults to versatile then, it tried yesterday and I
think it and it compiled fine actually. However, it is of course not
what the user wants.
The defconfigs of the new machines are currently in arm-soc
next/defconfig. While testing, I just merged the defconfig branch into
the soc branch, but then splitted the patch in two independent patches.
Arnd, what do you think?
--
Stefan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists