[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150521111238.GB7232@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 12:12:38 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Maninder Singh <maninder1.s@...sung.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, dhowells@...hat.com, fabf@...net.be,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"v.narang@...sung.com" <v.narang@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [EDT] [PATCH] devpts/inode.c : Fix Possible dentry NULL
dereference
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:28:52AM +0000, Maninder Singh wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] devpts/inode.c : Fix Possible dentry NULL dereference
>
> Issue reported by static tool Analyzer (Prevent).
> d_find_alias can return NULL to deentry, Thus we need NULL check
> before calling d_delete(dentry)
No, we do not. That inode must have come from devpts_pty_new() and it
wouldn't have made it out of there without having a dentry attached to
it (and pinned).
NAK.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists