linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/10] Various x86 pmu scheduling patches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 21 May 2015 04:48:16 -0700
From:	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] Various x86 pmu scheduling patches

Peter,

On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 4:17 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> Unless I messed things up again, patch 1 and 2 are for perf/urgent and the rest
> can wait.
>
> I would still like to relax the HT scheduling constraint in case there are no
> funny events at all, but I've not yet found a nice way to do that.
>
Are you talking about the HT bug workaround? If there is no
corrupting event across HT threads, then scheduling is not impacted.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/