[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150521132528.GM6776@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 06:25:28 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu: Deinline rcu_read_lock_sched_held() if
DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 09:09:43AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 21 May 2015 05:52:24 -0700
> "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 12:04:07PM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> > > DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC=y is not a production setting, but it is
> > > not very unusual either. Many developers routinely
> > > use kernels built with it enabled.
> > >
> > > Apart from being selected by hand, it is also auto-selected by
> > > PROVE_LOCKING "Lock debugging: prove locking correctness" and
> > > LOCK_STAT "Lock usage statistics" config options.
> > > LOCK STAT is necessary for "perf lock" to work.
> > >
> > > I wouldn't spend too much time optimizing it, but this particular
> > > function has a very large cost in code size: when it is deinlined,
> > > code size decreases by 830,000 bytes:
> > >
> > > text data bss dec hex filename
> > > 85674192 22294776 20627456 128596424 7aa39c8 vmlinux.before
> > > 84837612 22294424 20627456 127759492 79d7484 vmlinux
> > >
> > > (with this config: http://busybox.net/~vda/kernel_config)
> >
> > OK, I'll bite... I do see the numbers above, but is this really a
> > problem for anyone? As you say, DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC=y is not a production
> > setting.
> >
>
> Correct, and because it's not a production setting it should be fine as
> a call and not a static inline. The i$ hit probably neglects the saving
> of it being inlined too.
>
> It's not a big deal either way, but it may make building the kernel a
> bit faster ;-)
OK, if you believe that it is valuable enough to give it a Reviewed-by,
I will queue it. ;-)
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists