[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1432219778.5092.44.camel@mhfsdcap03>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 22:49:38 +0800
From: Yong Wu <yong.wu@...iatek.com>
To: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@...gle.com>
CC: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...gle.com>,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
Sasha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
srv_heupstream <srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:IOMMU DRIVERS" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>, <mitchelh@...eaurora.org>,
<k.zhang@...iatek.com>, <youhua.li@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] soc: mediatek: Add SMI driver
On Thu, 2015-05-21 at 22:33 +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Matthias Brugger
> <matthias.bgg@...il.com> wrote:
> > 2015-05-21 8:16 GMT+02:00 Yong Wu <yong.wu@...iatek.com>:
> >> Hi Matthias,
> >> Thanks very much for your suggestion.
> >> Abort the smi clock name, Could you help check below.
> >> The others I will improve in next time.
> >>
> >> On Tue, 2015-05-19 at 13:14 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> >>> 2015-05-15 11:43 GMT+02:00 Yong Wu <yong.wu@...iatek.com>:
> >>> > This patch add SMI(Smart Multimedia Interface) driver. This driver is
> >>> > responsible to enable/disable iommu and control the clocks of each local arbiter.
> >>> >
> >> [snip]
> >>> > +
> >>> > +#define SMI_LARB_MMU_EN (0xf00)
> >>> > +#define F_SMI_MMU_EN(port) (1 << (port))
> >>> > +
> >>> > +enum {
> >>> > + MTK_CLK_APB,
> >>> > + MTK_CLK_SMI,
> >>> > + MTK_CLK_MAX,
> >>>
> >>> Maybe add something like:
> >>> MTK_CLK_FIRST = MTK_CLK_APB,
> >>> to make the for loops better readable.
> >>>
> >> Then, Is it like this? :
> >> enum {
> >> MTK_CLK_FIRST = MTK_CLK_APB,
> >> MTK_CLK_SMI,
> >> MTK_CLK_MAX,
> >> }
> >> or the CLK_SMI also need MTK_CLK_SECOND = MTK_CLK_SMI.
> >
> >
> > something like:
> > enum {
> > MTK_CLK_FIRST,
> > MTK_CLK_APB = MTK_CLK_FIRST,
> > MTK_CLK_SMI,
> > MTK_CLK_LAST,
> > }
> >
> > So you can rewrite the for loop:
> > if (i = MTK_CLK_FIRST; i < MTK_CLK_LAST; i++)
>
> Actually, do we ever plan to add more clks per smi node?
No.
> If not, perhaps the whole driver would be simpler if you just
> explicitly handle the apb & smi clocks:
>
> struct mtk_smi_larb {
> void __iomem *base;
> spinlock_t portlock; /* lock for config port */
> struct device *smi;
> struct clk *clk_apb;
> struct clk *clk_smi;
> };
>
> And then all of the loops become just a pair of clock operations.
Thanks. I will try this and compare whether it will add many lines.
>
> Best Regards,
> -Dan
>
> >
> > Regards,
> > Matthias
> >
> >>> > +};
> >>> > +
> >>> > +struct mtk_smi_common {
> >>> > + void __iomem *base;
> >>>
> >>> That seems to be never used. Please delete it.
> >>>
> >>> > + struct clk *clk[MTK_CLK_MAX];
> >>> > +};
> >>> > +
> >>> > +struct mtk_smi_larb {
> >>> > + void __iomem *base;
> >>> > + spinlock_t portlock; /* lock for config port */
> >>> > + struct clk *clk[MTK_CLK_MAX];
> >>> > + struct device *smi;
> >>> > +};
> >>> > +
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Matthias
> >>
> > --
> > motzblog.wordpress.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists