lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <1432225472-5186-3-git-send-email-r.krypa@samsung.com>
Date:	Thu, 21 May 2015 18:24:32 +0200
From:	Rafal Krypa <r.krypa@...sung.com>
To:	Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
Cc:	James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rafal Krypa <r.krypa@...sung.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Smack: allow multiple labels in onlycap

Smack onlycap allows limiting of CAP_MAC_ADMIN and CAP_MAC_OVERRIDE to
processes running with the configured label. But having single privileged
label is not enough in some real use cases. On a complex system like Tizen,
there maybe few programs that need to configure Smack policy in run-time
and running them all with a single label is not always practical.
This patch extends onlycap feature for multiple labels. They are configured
in the same smackfs "onlycap" interface, separated by spaces.

Signed-off-by: Rafal Krypa <r.krypa@...sung.com>
---
 Documentation/security/Smack.txt |   6 +-
 security/smack/smack.h           |  25 +++---
 security/smack/smack_access.c    |  41 ++++++++++
 security/smack/smackfs.c         | 162 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 4 files changed, 162 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/security/Smack.txt b/Documentation/security/Smack.txt
index abc82f8..de5e1ae 100644
--- a/Documentation/security/Smack.txt
+++ b/Documentation/security/Smack.txt
@@ -206,11 +206,11 @@ netlabel
 	label. The format accepted on write is:
 		"%d.%d.%d.%d label" or "%d.%d.%d.%d/%d label".
 onlycap
-	This contains the label processes must have for CAP_MAC_ADMIN
+	This contains labels processes must have for CAP_MAC_ADMIN
 	and CAP_MAC_OVERRIDE to be effective. If this file is empty
 	these capabilities are effective at for processes with any
-	label. The value is set by writing the desired label to the
-	file or cleared by writing "-" to the file.
+	label. The values are set by writing the desired labels, separated
+	by spaces, to the file or cleared by writing "-" to the file.
 ptrace
 	This is used to define the current ptrace policy
 	0 - default: this is the policy that relies on Smack access rules.
diff --git a/security/smack/smack.h b/security/smack/smack.h
index b8c1a86..244e035 100644
--- a/security/smack/smack.h
+++ b/security/smack/smack.h
@@ -138,6 +138,11 @@ struct smk_port_label {
 	struct smack_known	*smk_out;	/* outgoing label */
 };
 
+struct smack_onlycap {
+	struct list_head	list;
+	struct smack_known	*smk_label;
+};
+
 /*
  * Mount options
  */
@@ -249,6 +254,7 @@ int smk_netlbl_mls(int, char *, struct netlbl_lsm_secattr *, int);
 struct smack_known *smk_import_entry(const char *, int);
 void smk_insert_entry(struct smack_known *skp);
 struct smack_known *smk_find_entry(const char *);
+int smack_privileged(int cap);
 
 /*
  * Shared data.
@@ -257,7 +263,6 @@ extern int smack_enabled;
 extern int smack_cipso_direct;
 extern int smack_cipso_mapped;
 extern struct smack_known *smack_net_ambient;
-extern struct smack_known *smack_onlycap;
 extern struct smack_known *smack_syslog_label;
 #ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_SMACK_BRINGUP
 extern struct smack_known *smack_unconfined;
@@ -276,6 +281,9 @@ extern struct mutex	smack_known_lock;
 extern struct list_head smack_known_list;
 extern struct list_head smk_netlbladdr_list;
 
+extern struct mutex     smack_onlycap_lock;
+extern struct list_head smack_onlycap_list;
+
 #define SMACK_HASH_SLOTS 16
 extern struct hlist_head smack_known_hash[SMACK_HASH_SLOTS];
 
@@ -332,21 +340,6 @@ static inline struct smack_known *smk_of_current(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * Is the task privileged and allowed to be privileged
- * by the onlycap rule.
- */
-static inline int smack_privileged(int cap)
-{
-	struct smack_known *skp = smk_of_current();
-
-	if (!capable(cap))
-		return 0;
-	if (smack_onlycap == NULL || smack_onlycap == skp)
-		return 1;
-	return 0;
-}
-
-/*
  * logging functions
  */
 #define SMACK_AUDIT_DENIED 0x1
diff --git a/security/smack/smack_access.c b/security/smack/smack_access.c
index 408e20b..00f6b38 100644
--- a/security/smack/smack_access.c
+++ b/security/smack/smack_access.c
@@ -617,3 +617,44 @@ struct smack_known *smack_from_secid(const u32 secid)
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 	return &smack_known_invalid;
 }
+
+/*
+ * Unless a process is running with one of these labels
+ * even having CAP_MAC_OVERRIDE isn't enough to grant
+ * privilege to violate MAC policy. If no labels are
+ * designated (the empty list case) capabilities apply to
+ * everyone.
+ */
+LIST_HEAD(smack_onlycap_list);
+DEFINE_MUTEX(smack_onlycap_lock);
+
+/*
+ * Is the task privileged and allowed to be privileged
+ * by the onlycap rule.
+ *
+ * Returns 1 if the task is allowed to be privileged, 0 if it's not.
+ */
+int smack_privileged(int cap)
+{
+	struct smack_known *skp = smk_of_current();
+	struct smack_onlycap *sop;
+
+	if (!capable(cap))
+		return 0;
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	if (list_empty(&smack_onlycap_list)) {
+		rcu_read_unlock();
+		return 1;
+	}
+
+	list_for_each_entry_rcu(sop, &smack_onlycap_list, list) {
+		if (sop->smk_label == skp) {
+			rcu_read_unlock();
+			return 1;
+		}
+	}
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+
+	return 0;
+}
diff --git a/security/smack/smackfs.c b/security/smack/smackfs.c
index e40dc48..2aabcb2 100644
--- a/security/smack/smackfs.c
+++ b/security/smack/smackfs.c
@@ -87,16 +87,6 @@ int smack_cipso_direct = SMACK_CIPSO_DIRECT_DEFAULT;
  */
 int smack_cipso_mapped = SMACK_CIPSO_MAPPED_DEFAULT;
 
-/*
- * Unless a process is running with this label even
- * having CAP_MAC_OVERRIDE isn't enough to grant
- * privilege to violate MAC policy. If no label is
- * designated (the NULL case) capabilities apply to
- * everyone. It is expected that the hat (^) label
- * will be used if any label is used.
- */
-struct smack_known *smack_onlycap;
-
 #ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_SMACK_BRINGUP
 /*
  * Allow one label to be unconfined. This is for
@@ -1636,34 +1626,78 @@ static const struct file_operations smk_ambient_ops = {
 	.llseek		= default_llseek,
 };
 
-/**
- * smk_read_onlycap - read() for smackfs/onlycap
- * @filp: file pointer, not actually used
- * @buf: where to put the result
- * @cn: maximum to send along
- * @ppos: where to start
- *
- * Returns number of bytes read or error code, as appropriate
+/*
+ * Seq_file operations for /smack/onlycap
  */
-static ssize_t smk_read_onlycap(struct file *filp, char __user *buf,
-				size_t cn, loff_t *ppos)
+static void *onlycap_seq_start(struct seq_file *s, loff_t *pos)
 {
-	char *smack = "";
-	ssize_t rc = -EINVAL;
-	int asize;
+	return smk_seq_start(s, pos, &smack_onlycap_list);
+}
 
-	if (*ppos != 0)
-		return 0;
+static void *onlycap_seq_next(struct seq_file *s, void *v, loff_t *pos)
+{
+	return smk_seq_next(s, v, pos, &smack_onlycap_list);
+}
 
-	if (smack_onlycap != NULL)
-		smack = smack_onlycap->smk_known;
+static int onlycap_seq_show(struct seq_file *s, void *v)
+{
+	struct list_head *list = v;
+	struct smack_onlycap *sop =
+		list_entry_rcu(list, struct smack_onlycap, list);
 
-	asize = strlen(smack) + 1;
+	seq_puts(s, sop->smk_label->smk_known);
+	seq_putc(s, ' ');
 
-	if (cn >= asize)
-		rc = simple_read_from_buffer(buf, cn, ppos, smack, asize);
+	return 0;
+}
 
-	return rc;
+static const struct seq_operations onlycap_seq_ops = {
+	.start = onlycap_seq_start,
+	.next  = onlycap_seq_next,
+	.show  = onlycap_seq_show,
+	.stop  = smk_seq_stop,
+};
+
+static int smk_open_onlycap(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
+{
+	return seq_open(file, &onlycap_seq_ops);
+}
+
+/**
+ * list_swap_rcu - swap public list with a private one in RCU-safe way
+ * The caller must hold appropriate mutex to prevent concurrent modifications
+ * to the public list.
+ * Private list is assumed to be not accessible to other threads yet.
+ *
+ * @public: public list
+ * @private: private list
+ */
+static void list_swap_rcu(struct list_head *public, struct list_head *private)
+{
+	struct list_head *first, *last;
+
+	if (list_empty(public)) {
+		list_splice_init_rcu(private, public, synchronize_rcu);
+	} else {
+		/* Remember public list before replacing it */
+		first = public->next;
+		last = public->prev;
+
+		/* Publish private list in place of public in RCU-safe way */
+		private->prev->next = public;
+		private->next->prev = public;
+		rcu_assign_pointer(public->next, private->next);
+		public->prev = private->prev;
+
+		synchronize_rcu();
+
+		/* When all readers are done with the old public list,
+		 * attach it in place of private */
+		private->next = first;
+		private->prev = last;
+		first->prev = private;
+		last->next = private;
+	}
 }
 
 /**
@@ -1679,28 +1713,47 @@ static ssize_t smk_write_onlycap(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
 				 size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
 {
 	char *data;
-	struct smack_known *skp = smk_of_task(current->cred->security);
+	char *data_parse
+	char *tok;
+	struct smack_known *skp;
+	struct smack_onlycap *sop;
+	struct smack_onlycap *sop2;
+	LIST_HEAD(list_tmp);
 	int rc = count;
 
 	if (!smack_privileged(CAP_MAC_ADMIN))
 		return -EPERM;
 
-	/*
-	 * This can be done using smk_access() but is done
-	 * explicitly for clarity. The smk_access() implementation
-	 * would use smk_access(smack_onlycap, MAY_WRITE)
-	 */
-	if (smack_onlycap != NULL && smack_onlycap != skp)
-		return -EPERM;
-
 	data = kzalloc(count + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (data == NULL)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	if (copy_from_user(data, buf, count) != 0) {
-		rc = -EFAULT;
-		goto freeout;
+		kfree(data);
+		return -EFAULT;
+	}
+
+	data_parse = data;
+	while ((tok = strsep(&data_parse, " ")) != NULL) {
+		if (!*tok)
+			continue;
+
+		skp = smk_import_entry(tok, 0);
+		if (IS_ERR(skp)) {
+			rc = PTR_ERR(skp);
+			break;
+		}
+
+		sop = kzalloc(sizeof(*sop), GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (sop == NULL) {
+			rc = -ENOMEM;
+			break;
+		}
+
+		sop->smk_label = skp;
+		list_add_rcu(&sop->list, &list_tmp);
 	}
+	kfree(data);
 
 	/*
 	 * Clear the smack_onlycap on invalid label errors. This means
@@ -1710,26 +1763,29 @@ static ssize_t smk_write_onlycap(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
 	 * so "-usecapabilities" will also work.
 	 *
 	 * But do so only on invalid label, not on system errors.
+	 * The invalid label must be first to count as clearing attempt.
 	 */
-	skp = smk_import_entry(data, count);
-	if (PTR_ERR(skp) == -EINVAL)
-		skp = NULL;
-	else if (IS_ERR(skp)) {
-		rc = PTR_ERR(skp);
-		goto freeout;
+	if (rc == -EINVAL && list_empty(&list_tmp))
+		rc = count;
+
+	if (rc >= 0) {
+		mutex_lock(&smack_onlycap_lock);
+		list_swap_rcu(&smack_onlycap_list, &list_tmp);
+		mutex_unlock(&smack_onlycap_lock);
 	}
 
-	smack_onlycap = skp;
+	list_for_each_entry_safe(sop, sop2, &list_tmp, list)
+		kfree(sop);
 
-freeout:
-	kfree(data);
 	return rc;
 }
 
 static const struct file_operations smk_onlycap_ops = {
-	.read		= smk_read_onlycap,
+	.open		= smk_open_onlycap,
+	.read		= seq_read,
 	.write		= smk_write_onlycap,
-	.llseek		= default_llseek,
+	.llseek		= seq_lseek,
+	.release	= seq_release,
 };
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_SMACK_BRINGUP
-- 
2.1.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ