[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2799695.KoAD3Q19Xm@phil>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 19:59:13 +0200
From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc: "Huang, Tao" <huangtao@...k-chips.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
Chris Zhong <zyw@...k-chips.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Tony Xie <tony.xie@...k-chips.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: rockchip: restore dapswjdp after suspend
Hi Doug,
Am Donnerstag, 21. Mai 2015, 08:40:55 schrieb Doug Anderson:
> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 7:02 PM, Huang, Tao <huangtao@...k-chips.com> wrote:
> >> It turns out that's not a safe assumption. In some cases (pending
> >> interrupts) it's possible that the WFI might act as a no-op and the
> >> MaskROM will never run.
> > Anyway, restore the value is okay, which make the code more symmetrically
>
> OK. Heiko: applying this won't hurt, but it will only be useful if we
> find a way to return from the WFI successfully...
As it looks sane but doesn't fix an immediate problem I have applied this to my
soc-branch for 4.2 .
Thanks
Heiko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists