[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <s5hk2w14x8b.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 20:11:16 +0200
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@...oraproject.org>,
Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
"Gustavo F. Padovan" <gustavo@...ovan.org>,
"bluez mailin list (linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org)"
<linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND][PATCH] Bluetooth: Make request workqueue freezable
At Thu, 21 May 2015 13:37:56 -0400 (EDT),
Alan Stern wrote:
>
> On Thu, 21 May 2015, Takashi Iwai wrote:
>
> > At Thu, 21 May 2015 11:26:17 -0400 (EDT),
> > Alan Stern wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 21 May 2015, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > >
> > > > At Thu, 21 May 2015 10:18:08 -0400 (EDT),
> > > > Alan Stern wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, 21 May 2015, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Then avoiding the failed firmware is no solution, indeed.
> > > > > > If it's a new probe, it should be never executed during resume.
> > > > >
> > > > > Can you expand this comment? What's wrong with probing during resume?
> > > >
> > > > Well, if the probe requires the access to a user-space file, it can't
> > > > be done during resume. That's the very problem we're seeing now.
> > > > The firmware loader can't help much alone if it's a new device
> > > > object.
> > >
> > > But the same thing happens during early boot, if the driver is built
> > > into the kernel. When the probe occurs, userspace isn't up and running
> > > yet, so the firmware loader can't do anything.
> > >
> > > Why should probe during resume be any worse than probe during early
> > > boot?
> >
> > The early boot has initrd, so the files can be there. But the resume
> > has no way to fetch the file except for cached data.
>
> I suppose USB could delay re-probing until userspace is running again,
> if we knew when that was. But it would be awkward and prone to races.
> It also would leave a user-visible window of time during which the
> device does not exist, which we want to avoid. (This may not matter
> for bluetooth, but it does matter for other kinds of devices.)
Right.
> I would prefer to solve this problem in a different way, if possible.
Well, we're back in square again :)
But, before going further the discussion in loop again, I'd like to
know which firmware file actually hits. Is it a non-existing
firmware? Or is it a firmware that should have been cached? In the
latter case, why it isn't used?
Takashi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists