linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/6 linux-next] ubifs: remove else after return

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <555FA3A5.7070600@nod.at>
Date:	Fri, 22 May 2015 23:46:13 +0200
From:	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To:	Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be>
CC:	"linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6 linux-next] ubifs: remove else after return

Am 22.05.2015 um 23:37 schrieb Fabian Frederick:
> 
> 
>> On 19 May 2015 at 19:57 Richard Weinberger <richard@....at> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 19.05.2015 um 19:42 schrieb Fabian Frederick:
>>>          All was compiled but untested.
>>
>> Can you please test your changes too?
>> Trivial looking changes introduce sometimes issues and having them
>> tested would be wonderful.
>>
>> You can test UBIFS using nandsim or mtdram on any Linux
>> system.
>> See: http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/faq/nand.html#L_nand_nandsim
> 
> I guess the following patches can be applied without testing ?

Let me put it to you this way, refusing to test your patches does not
increase the possibility to get them merged. :-)

Really, test your patches and don't become a patch bot.

Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/