linux-kernel - Re: [V5 PATCH 1/5] ACPI / scan: Parse

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 23 May 2015 01:05:30 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:	Suravee Suthikulanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>
Cc:	lenb@...nel.org, catalin.marinas@....com, will.deacon@....com,
	thomas.lendacky@....com, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
	davem@...emloft.net, arnd@...db.de, msalter@...hat.com,
	hanjun.guo@...aro.org, al.stone@...aro.org,
	grant.likely@...aro.org, leo.duran@....com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [V5 PATCH 1/5] ACPI / scan: Parse _CCA and setup device coherency

On Friday, May 22, 2015 05:24:15 PM Suravee Suthikulanit wrote:
> Not sure if this went out earlier. So I am resending.
> 
> On 5/22/15 16:56, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/glue.c b/drivers/acpi/glue.c
> >> >index 39c485b..b9657af 100644
> >> >--- a/drivers/acpi/glue.c
> >> >+++ b/drivers/acpi/glue.c
> >> >@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> >> >  #include <linux/slab.h>
> >> >  #include <linux/rwsem.h>
> >> >  #include <linux/acpi.h>
> >> >+#include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
> >> >
> >> >  #include "internal.h"
> >> >
> >> >@@ -167,6 +168,7 @@ int acpi_bind_one(struct device *dev, struct acpi_device *acpi_dev)
> >> >  	struct list_head *physnode_list;
> >> >  	unsigned int node_id;
> >> >  	int retval = -EINVAL;
> >> >+	bool coherent;
> >> >
> >> >  	if (has_acpi_companion(dev)) {
> >> >  		if (acpi_dev) {
> >> >@@ -223,6 +225,9 @@ int acpi_bind_one(struct device *dev, struct acpi_device *acpi_dev)
> >> >  	if (!has_acpi_companion(dev))
> >> >  		ACPI_COMPANION_SET(dev, acpi_dev);
> >> >
> >> >+	if (acpi_check_dma(acpi_dev, &coherent))
> >> >+		arch_setup_dma_ops(dev, 0, 0, NULL, coherent);
> >> >+
> > Well, so is this going to work for PCI too after all?
> >
> 
> No, as Bjorn suggested, PCI changes for setting DMA coherent from _CCA 
> (patch 3/6 in V4) will be submitted separately. We are working on 
> cleaning up and up-streaming the PCI ACPI support for ARM64.

OK, but acpi_bind_one() is called for PCI devices too.  Won't that be a problem?


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/