[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGS+omD-mctfN06AO_RdeopqwyM-f81bXT8c0mhzKS_3+ha2zQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 14:12:56 +0800
From: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@...omium.org>
To: James Liao <jamesjj.liao@...iatek.com>
Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND..." <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
Sasha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] ARM64: MediaTek MT8173: Add SCPSYS device node
Hi James,
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 1:40 PM, James Liao <jamesjj.liao@...iatek.com> wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Fri, 2015-05-22 at 12:19 +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
>> On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 10:41 AM, James Liao <jamesjj.liao@...iatek.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Sascha is right. I had confirmed with our designer that MFG on MT8173
>> > uses clk26m to check state. I also tested MFG domain power on/off with
>> > CLK_TOP_MFG_SEL off and it worked correctly.
>>
>> Wait - the designer said to use clk26m, but you tested with CLK_TOP_MFG_SEL.
>> Now I am even more confused.
>> Which is the correct clock to use for the mfg power domains?
>
> I tested MFG domain power on/off with MFG_SEL "OFF". If MFG domain use
> MFG_SEL as its bus clock, it will be timeout while waiting SRAM ACK. But
> in my test, MFG power domain can power on/off without MFG_SEL. That
> means it doesn't need MFG_SEL while power on/off MFG domains.
>
>> >
>> > My patch set yesterday add subsystem clocks, which are not needed by
>> > power domain on/off. So I think these 2 patch set are independent.
>>
>> In other versions of the SCPSYS patch set, the scpsys node has
>> additional "subsystem bus clocks".
>
> That's my fault because I provided wrong information to Sascha. So in
> his early version of mtk-scpsys driver, the clocks setting of power
> domains are incorrect. The correct clock setting for each power domain
> should be:
>
> POWER_DOMAIN_MFG: clk26m (no need to enable topckgen clocks)
> POWER_DOMAIN_DISP: mm_sel
> POWER_DOMAIN_VDEC: mm_sel
> POWER_DOMAIN_VENC: mm_sel
> POWER_DOMAIN_VENC_LT: mm_sel
> POWER_DOMAIN_ISP: mm_sel
>
>> So will we need additional patches later to add back these additional
>> clocks which have been removed from the current version of this pach?
>
> No. Clocks provided by topckgen are enough for scpsys driver. Please see
> my comments below.
>
>> In other words, will there be a follow up patch like below, plus
>> another patch to add these clocks to "enum clk_id":
>>
>> @@ -163,9 +163,12 @@
>> compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-scpsys";
>> #power-domain-cells = <1>;
>> reg = <0 0x10006000 0 0x1000>;
>> - clocks = <&clk26m>,
>> - <&topckgen CLK_TOP_MM_SEL>;
>> - clock-names = "mfg", "mm";
>> + clocks = <&topckgen CLK_TOP_MFG_SEL>,
>> + <&topckgen CLK_TOP_MM_SEL>,
>> + <&topckgen CLK_TOP_VDEC_SEL>,
>> + <&topckgen CLK_TOP_VENC_SEL>,
>> + <&topckgen CLK_TOP_VENC_LT_SEL>;
>> + clock-names = "mfg", "mm", "vdec", "venc", "venc_lt";
>> infracfg = <&infracfg>;
>> };
>
> These clocks come from topckgen. In our term, they are "top clocks".
> Subsystem clocks which mentioned in my patch set are provided by
> subsystems such as mmsys, vdecsys, vencsys and so on.
This is all great news!
Thanks for the detailed update.
Best Regards,
-Daniel
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> James
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists