Message-ID: <555EDCA9.4030007@broadcom.com>
Date:	Fri, 22 May 2015 09:37:13 +0200
From:	Arend van Spriel <arend@...adcom.com>
To:	Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>
CC:	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
	Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>, Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>,
	Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Laura Abbott <labbott@...oraproject.org>,
	"Johan Hedberg" <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
	"Gustavo F. Padovan" <gustavo@...ovan.org>,
	"bluez mailin list (linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org)" 
	<linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND][PATCH] Bluetooth: Make request workqueue freezable

On 05/22/15 02:21, Laura Abbott wrote:
> On 05/21/2015 08:26 AM, Alan Stern wrote:
>> On Thu, 21 May 2015, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Alan,
>>>
>>>>> Then avoiding the failed firmware is no solution, indeed.
>>>>> If it's a new probe, it should be never executed during resume.
>>>>
>>>> Can you expand this comment? What's wrong with probing during resume?
>>>>
>>>> The USB stack does carry out probes during resume under certain
>>>> circumstances. A driver lacking a reset_resume callback is one of
>>>> those circumstances.
>>>
>>> in case the platform kills the power to the USB lines, we can never
>>> do anything about this. I do not want to hack around this in the
>>> driver.
>>>
>>> What are the cases where we should implement reset_resume and would
>>> it really help here. Since the btusb.ko driver implements
>>> suspend/resume support, would reset_resume ever be called?
>>
>> One of those cases is exactly what you have been talking about: when
>> the platform kills power to the USB lines during suspend. The driver's
>> reset_resume routine will be called during resume, as opposed to the
>> probe routine being called. Therefore the driver will be able to tell
>> that this is not a new device instance.
>>
>> The other cases are less likely to occur: a device is unable to resume
>> normally and requires a reset before it will start working again, or
>> something else goes wrong along those lines.
>>
>>> However I get the feeling someone needs to go back and see if the
>>> device is the same one and just gets probed again or if it is a new
>>> one from the USB host stack perspective.
>>
>> That can be done easily enough by enabling usbcore debugging before
>> carrying out the system suspend:
>>
>> echo 'module usbcore =p' >/debug/dynamic_debug/control
>>
>> The debugging information in the kernel log will tell just what
>> happened.
>>
>>
>
> Playing around in my test setup as a baseline
>
> [ 41.991035] usb usb1-port11: not reset yet, waiting 50ms
> [ 42.092902] usb 1-11: reset full-speed USB device number 4 using xhci_hcd
> [ 42.143575] usb usb1-port11: not reset yet, waiting 50ms
> [ 42.257822] btusb 1-11:1.0: no reset_resume for driver btusb?
> [ 42.257823] btusb 1-11:1.1: no reset_resume for driver btusb?
> [ 42.257825] btusb 1-11:1.0: forced unbind
> [ 42.258305] kworker/dying (826) used greatest stack depth: 10680 bytes
> left
> [ 42.331342] usb 1-9.2: reset full-speed USB device number 7 using xhci_hcd
> [ 42.416631] usb 1-9.2: ep0 maxpacket = 8
> [ 42.681288] usb 1-9.1: reset low-speed USB device number 5 using xhci_hcd
> [ 42.968138] usb 1-9.1: ep 0x81 - rounding interval to 64 microframes,
> ep desc says 80 microframes
> [ 42.968157] usb 1-9.1: ep 0x82 - rounding interval to 64 microframes,
> ep desc says 80 microframes
> [ 43.036290] usb 1-9.4: reset high-speed USB device number 8 using xhci_hcd
> [ 43.123126] hub 1-9.4:1.0: hub_reset_resume
> [ 43.123581] hub 1-9.4:1.0: enabling power on all ports
> [ 43.224853] PM: resume of devices complete after 2456.587 msecs
> [ 43.225038] btusb 1-11:1.0: usb_probe_interface
> [ 43.225040] btusb 1-11:1.0: usb_probe_interface - got id
> [ 43.225802] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 43.225807] WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 2844 at
> drivers/base/firmware_class.c:1118 _request_firmware+0x5ee/0x890()
>
>
> so it is trying to call the reset resume. If I try a 'dummy reset resume'
>
> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
> index a7bdac0..cda8137 100644
> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
> @@ -3401,6 +3401,7 @@ static struct usb_driver btusb_driver = {
> #ifdef CONFIG_PM
> .suspend = btusb_suspend,
> .resume = btusb_resume,
> + .reset_resume = btusb_resume,
> #endif
> .id_table = btusb_table,
> .supports_autosuspend = 1,
>
>
> I no longer see the warning which means that probe is no longer being
> called.
>
> Marcel, does implementing a proper reset_resume callback seem like the
> right
> approach or do you need more information?

Hi, Laura

I believe that some devices supported by btusb would need to do a 
request_firmware() in the reset_resume() callback and thus end up with 
the same issue. btusb could store the firmware obtained during the probe 
in it driver private structure and use that in reset_resume() callback, 
but it means the memory for the firmware blobs will not be released 
until the driver is unloaded.

Regards,
Arend

> Thanks,
> Laura
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> linux-bluetooth" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists