[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <555EE165.3090709@suse.de>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 09:57:25 +0200
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
To: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...erainc.com>,
target-devel <target-devel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Nicholas Bellinger <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] target: Drop lun_sep_lock for se_lun->lun_se_dev
RCU usage
On 05/22/2015 09:06 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
>
> With se_port and t10_alua_tg_pt_gp_member being absored into se_lun,
> there is no need for an extra lock to protect se_lun->lun_se_dev
> assignment.
>
> Also, convert se_lun->lun_stats to use atomic_long_t within the
> target_complete_ok_work() completion callback.
>
> Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
> ---
> drivers/target/target_core_device.c | 1 -
> drivers/target/target_core_stat.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++-----------------
> drivers/target/target_core_tpg.c | 8 ++---
> drivers/target/target_core_transport.c | 22 ++++--------
> include/target/target_core_base.h | 9 +++--
> 5 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
>
[ .. ]
> diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_tpg.c b/drivers/target/target_core_tpg.c
> index 8764f1c..f60b74e 100644
> --- a/drivers/target/target_core_tpg.c
> +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_tpg.c
> @@ -601,7 +601,6 @@ struct se_lun *core_tpg_alloc_lun(
> lun->lun_link_magic = SE_LUN_LINK_MAGIC;
> lun->lun_status = TRANSPORT_LUN_STATUS_FREE;
> atomic_set(&lun->lun_acl_count, 0);
> - spin_lock_init(&lun->lun_sep_lock);
> init_completion(&lun->lun_ref_comp);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&lun->lun_deve_list);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&lun->lun_dev_link);
> @@ -638,10 +637,7 @@ int core_tpg_add_lun(
> target_attach_tg_pt_gp(lun, dev->t10_alua.default_tg_pt_gp);
>
> mutex_lock(&tpg->tpg_lun_mutex);
> -
> - spin_lock(&lun->lun_sep_lock);
> - lun->lun_se_dev = dev;
> - spin_unlock(&lun->lun_sep_lock);
> + rcu_assign_pointer(lun->lun_se_dev, dev);
>
> spin_lock(&dev->se_port_lock);
> dev->export_count++;
> @@ -683,7 +679,7 @@ void core_tpg_remove_lun(
> dev->export_count--;
> spin_unlock(&dev->se_port_lock);
>
> - lun->lun_se_dev = NULL;
> + rcu_assign_pointer(lun->lun_se_dev, NULL);
> }
>
> lun->lun_status = TRANSPORT_LUN_STATUS_FREE;
Doesn't this need to go under 'dev->se_port_lock' like in
core_tgp_add_lun() ?
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage
hare@...e.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: F. Imendörffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists