[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <555EF30C.60108@samsung.com>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 11:12:44 +0200
From: Marcin Jabrzyk <m.jabrzyk@...sung.com>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Cc: minchan@...nel.org, ngupta@...are.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
kyungmin.park@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] zram: check compressor name before setting it
Hi,
On 22/05/15 10:56, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (05/22/15 10:31), Marcin Jabrzyk wrote:
>> Zram sysfs interface was not making any check of
>> proper compressor name when setting it.
>> Any name is accepted, but further tries of device
>> creation would end up with not very meaningfull error.
>> eg.
>>
>> echo lz0 > comp_algorithm
>> echo 200M > disksize
>> echo: write error: Invalid argument
>>
>
> no.
>
> zram already complains about failed comp backend creation.
> it's in dmesg (or syslog, etc.):
>
> "zram: Cannot initialise %s compressing backend"
>
OK, now I see that. Sorry for the noise.
> second, there is not much value in exposing zcomp internals,
> especially when the result is just another line in dmesg output.
From the other hand, the only valid values that can be written are
in 'comp_algorithm'.
So when writing other one, returning -EINVAL seems to be reasonable.
The user would get immediately information that he can't do that,
now the information can be very deferred in time.
I'm not for exposing more internals, but getting -EINVAL would be nice I
think.
>
> -ss
>
Best regards,
Marcin Jabrzyk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists