[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1432294213.8255.3.camel@suse.com>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 13:30:13 +0200
From: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>
To: Arend van Spriel <arend@...adcom.com>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@...oraproject.org>,
JohanHedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
"Gustavo F. Padovan" <gustavo@...ovan.org>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
"bluez mailin list (linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org)"
<linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND][PATCH] Bluetooth: Make request workqueue freezable
On Thu, 2015-05-21 at 22:46 +0200, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> On 05/21/15 19:32, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> >>>>> Well, if the probe requires the access to a user-space file, it can't
> >>>>> be done during resume. That's the very problem we're seeing now.
> >>>>> The firmware loader can't help much alone if it's a new device
> >>>>> object.
>
> So you are saying each device driver should come up with some retry
> mechanism. Would make more sense to come up with something like that
> behind the scenes in the firmware loader so all device drivers can rely
> on one and the same solution.
There is already a notifier for this. I don't see why the firmware
layer couldn't retrigger a match for all unbound devices, just like
we do when a new driver is loaded.
Regards
Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists