[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150522130019.GN4150@mwanda>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 16:00:19 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@...el.com>,
Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>,
HPDD-discuss@...1.01.org, James Simmons <uja.ornl@...il.com>,
James Simmons <uja.ornl@...oo.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] staging:lustre: remove kernel defines in userland
headers
This patch seems fine but it would also be better if it were broken up
into easy to review patches.
[patch 1] delete LNET_USE_LIB_FREELIST code
This is theortetically what this patch does except it does tons
of other things as well.
Patches which delete whole functions, #defines or from #ifdef to #endif
are normally easy to review. When there are + lines it is hard.
[patch 2] move things around (i guess)?
[patch 3] white space fixes
[patch 4] get rid of lnet_eq_free_locked() and macro friends.
[patch 5] rename CamelCase functions
[patch 6] clean up lnet_msg_container_setup()
> typedef struct lnet_peer {
> - struct list_head lp_hashlist; /* chain on peer hash */
> - struct list_head lp_txq; /* messages blocking for tx credits */
> - struct list_head lp_rtrq; /* messages blocking for router credits */
> - struct list_head lp_rtr_list; /* chain on router list */
> - int lp_txcredits; /* # tx credits available */
> - int lp_mintxcredits; /* low water mark */
> - int lp_rtrcredits; /* # router credits */
> - int lp_minrtrcredits; /* low water mark */
> - unsigned int lp_alive:1; /* alive/dead? */
> - unsigned int lp_notify:1; /* notification outstanding? */
> - unsigned int lp_notifylnd:1; /* outstanding notification for LND? */
> - unsigned int lp_notifying:1; /* some thread is handling notification */
> - unsigned int lp_ping_notsent; /* SEND event outstanding from ping */
> - int lp_alive_count; /* # times router went dead<->alive */
> - long lp_txqnob; /* bytes queued for sending */
> - unsigned long lp_timestamp; /* time of last aliveness news */
> - unsigned long lp_ping_timestamp; /* time of last ping attempt */
> - unsigned long lp_ping_deadline; /* != 0 if ping reply expected */
> - unsigned long lp_last_alive; /* when I was last alive */
> - unsigned long lp_last_query; /* when lp_ni was queried last time */
> - lnet_ni_t *lp_ni; /* interface peer is on */
> - lnet_nid_t lp_nid; /* peer's NID */
> - int lp_refcount; /* # refs */
> - int lp_cpt; /* CPT this peer attached on */
> + /* chain on peer hash */
> + struct list_head lp_hashlist;
> + /* messages blocking for tx credits */
> + struct list_head lp_txq;
> + /* messages blocking for router credits */
> + struct list_head lp_rtrq;
> + /* chain on router list */
> + struct list_head lp_rtr_list;
> + /* # tx credits available */
> + int lp_txcredits;
> + /* low water mark */
> + int lp_mintxcredits;
> + /* # router credits */
> + int lp_rtrcredits;
> + /* low water mark */
> + int lp_minrtrcredits;
> + /* alive/dead? */
> + unsigned int lp_alive:1;
> + /* notification outstanding? */
> + unsigned int lp_notify:1;
> + /* outstanding notification for LND? */
> + unsigned int lp_notifylnd:1;
> + /* some thread is handling notification */
> + unsigned int lp_notifying:1;
> + /* SEND event outstanding from ping */
> + unsigned int lp_ping_notsent;
> + /* # times router went dead<->alive */
> + int lp_alive_count;
> + /* bytes queued for sending */
> + long lp_txqnob;
> + /* time of last aliveness news */
> + unsigned long lp_timestamp;
> + /* time of last ping attempt */
> + unsigned long lp_ping_timestamp;
> + /* != 0 if ping reply expected */
> + unsigned long lp_ping_deadline;
> + /* when I was last alive */
> + unsigned long lp_last_alive;
> + /* when lp_ni was queried last time */
> + unsigned long lp_last_query;
> + /* interface peer is on */
> + lnet_ni_t *lp_ni;
> + /* peer's NID */
> + lnet_nid_t lp_nid;
> + /* # refs */
> + int lp_refcount;
> + /* CPT this peer attached on */
> + int lp_cpt;
This new block of declarations is uglier than the original. Don't make
things uglier.
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists