[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4095167.UOriXdSu53@wuerfel>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 16:55:04 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
Cc: fu.wei@...aro.org, Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com,
linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, tekkamanninja@...il.com,
graeme.gregory@...aro.org, al.stone@...aro.org,
timur@...eaurora.org, ashwin.chaugule@...aro.org,
linux@...ck-us.net, vgandhi@...eaurora.org, wim@...ana.be,
jcm@...hat.com, leo.duran@....com, corbet@....net,
mark.rutland@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] Watchdog: introduce ARM SBSA watchdog driver
On Friday 22 May 2015 22:50:30 Hanjun Guo wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig b/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig
> > index e5e7c55..25a0df1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig
> > @@ -152,6 +152,18 @@ config ARM_SP805_WATCHDOG
> > ARM Primecell SP805 Watchdog timer. This will reboot your system when
> > the timeout is reached.
> >
> > +config ARM_SBSA_WATCHDOG
> > + tristate "ARM SBSA Generic Watchdog"
> > + depends on ARM || ARM64 || COMPILE_TEST
>
> SBSA is for ARMv8-A based (64-bit) servers, no need to depends on ARM,
> and why we depends on COMPILE_TEST?
>
I think it's a reasonable assumption that someone will sooner or later
put that hardware into an ARM32 machine, or run a 32-bit kernel on
a chip that has it.
While SBSA requires this watchdog device, nothing prevents SoC
manufacturers from using the same design in something that is not
a server.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists