[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1432314077.2185.4.camel@stgolabs.net>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 10:01:17 -0700
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
To: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Aneesh Kumar <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@...baba-inc.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 PATCH 04/10] mm/hugetlb: expose hugetlb fault mutex for
use by fallocate
On Thu, 2015-05-21 at 08:47 -0700, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> +/*
> + * Interfaces to the fault mutex routines for use by hugetlbfs
> + * fallocate code. Faults must be synchronized with page adds or
> + * deletes by fallocate. fallocate only deals with shared mappings.
> + */
> +u32 hugetlb_fault_mutex_shared_hash(struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t idx)
> +{
> + return fault_mutex_hash(NULL, NULL, NULL, mapping, idx, 0);
> +}
> +
> +void hugetlb_fault_mutex_lock(u32 hash)
> +{
> + mutex_lock(&htlb_fault_mutex_table[hash]);
> +}
> +
> +void hugetlb_fault_mutex_unlock(u32 hash)
> +{
> + mutex_unlock(&htlb_fault_mutex_table[hash]);
> +}+
These should really be inlined -- maybe add them to hugetlb.h along with
the mutex hashtable bits.
Thanks,
Davidlohr
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists