[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <698657669.25971432265807247.JavaMail.weblogic@epmlwas06d>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 03:36:51 +0000 (GMT)
From: Maninder Singh <maninder1.s@...sung.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"mhocko@...e.cz" <mhocko@...e.cz>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>,
"riel@...hat.com" <riel@...hat.com>,
"ionut.m.alexa@...il.com" <ionut.m.alexa@...il.com>,
"peter@...leysoftware.com" <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [EDT][PATCH] kernel/exit.c : Fix missing read_unlock
EP-F6AA0618C49C4AEDA73BFF1B39950BAB
Hi Oleg,
>> Hi,
>>
>> From: Maninder Singh <maninder1.s@...sung.com>
>>
>> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] kernel/exit.c : Fix missing task_unlock
>>
>> This patch adds missing read_unlock if do_wait_thread or ptrace_do_wait
>> returns non zero.
>
>Confused...
>
>wait_consider_task() should drop tasklist_lock if it returns non-zero?
>
>
>> --- a/kernel/exit.c
>> +++ b/kernel/exit.c
>> @@ -1486,12 +1486,16 @@ repeat:
>> tsk = current;
>> do {
>> retval = do_wait_thread(wo, tsk);
>> - if (retval)
>> + if (retval) {
>> + read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
>> goto end;
>> + }
>>
>> retval = ptrace_do_wait(wo, tsk);
>> - if (retval)
>> + if (retval) {
>> + read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
>> goto end;
>> + }
>
>Well, the patch is obviously wrong. Because, again, tasklist_lock was
>already unlocked if (say) wait_task_zombie() reaps a child.
Yes, agree, My wrong
>If you think there is a case which forgets to unlock, please tell us
>more.
I have checked It is getting unlocked in wait_task_zombie Sorry for unnecessary disturbance.
>Oleg.
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists