[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1432329245-5844-49-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 17:14:02 -0400
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: axboe@...nel.dk
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jack@...e.cz, hch@...radead.org,
hannes@...xchg.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
vgoyal@...hat.com, lizefan@...wei.com, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, mhocko@...e.cz, clm@...com,
fengguang.wu@...el.com, david@...morbit.com, gthelen@...gle.com,
khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 48/51] writeback: dirty inodes against their matching cgroup bdi_writeback's
__mark_inode_dirty() always dirtied the inode against the root wb
(bdi_writeback). The previous patches added all the infrastructure
necessary to attribute an inode against the wb of the dirtying cgroup.
This patch updates __mark_inode_dirty() so that it uses the wb
associated with the inode instead of unconditionally using the root
one.
Currently, none of the filesystems has FS_CGROUP_WRITEBACK and all
pages will keep being dirtied against the root wb.
v2: Updated for per-inode wb association.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
---
fs/fs-writeback.c | 23 +++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
index 59d76f6..881ea5d 100644
--- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -1504,7 +1504,6 @@ static noinline void block_dump___mark_inode_dirty(struct inode *inode)
void __mark_inode_dirty(struct inode *inode, int flags)
{
struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb;
- struct backing_dev_info *bdi = NULL;
int dirtytime;
trace_writeback_mark_inode_dirty(inode, flags);
@@ -1574,30 +1573,30 @@ void __mark_inode_dirty(struct inode *inode, int flags)
* reposition it (that would break b_dirty time-ordering).
*/
if (!was_dirty) {
+ struct bdi_writeback *wb = inode_to_wb(inode);
struct list_head *dirty_list;
bool wakeup_bdi = false;
- bdi = inode_to_bdi(inode);
spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
- spin_lock(&bdi->wb.list_lock);
+ spin_lock(&wb->list_lock);
- WARN(bdi_cap_writeback_dirty(bdi) &&
- !test_bit(WB_registered, &bdi->wb.state),
- "bdi-%s not registered\n", bdi->name);
+ WARN(bdi_cap_writeback_dirty(wb->bdi) &&
+ !test_bit(WB_registered, &wb->state),
+ "bdi-%s not registered\n", wb->bdi->name);
inode->dirtied_when = jiffies;
if (dirtytime)
inode->dirtied_time_when = jiffies;
if (inode->i_state & (I_DIRTY_INODE | I_DIRTY_PAGES))
- dirty_list = &bdi->wb.b_dirty;
+ dirty_list = &wb->b_dirty;
else
- dirty_list = &bdi->wb.b_dirty_time;
+ dirty_list = &wb->b_dirty_time;
- wakeup_bdi = inode_wb_list_move_locked(inode, &bdi->wb,
+ wakeup_bdi = inode_wb_list_move_locked(inode, wb,
dirty_list);
- spin_unlock(&bdi->wb.list_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&wb->list_lock);
trace_writeback_dirty_inode_enqueue(inode);
/*
@@ -1606,8 +1605,8 @@ void __mark_inode_dirty(struct inode *inode, int flags)
* to make sure background write-back happens
* later.
*/
- if (bdi_cap_writeback_dirty(bdi) && wakeup_bdi)
- wb_wakeup_delayed(&bdi->wb);
+ if (bdi_cap_writeback_dirty(wb->bdi) && wakeup_bdi)
+ wb_wakeup_delayed(wb);
return;
}
}
--
2.4.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists