linux-kernel - [PATCH 34/51] writeback: don't issue wb_writeback

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1432329245-5844-35-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
Date:	Fri, 22 May 2015 17:13:48 -0400
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	axboe@...nel.dk
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jack@...e.cz, hch@...radead.org,
	hannes@...xchg.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	vgoyal@...hat.com, lizefan@...wei.com, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, mhocko@...e.cz, clm@...com,
	fengguang.wu@...el.com, david@...morbit.com, gthelen@...gle.com,
	khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 34/51] writeback: don't issue wb_writeback_work if clean

There are several places in fs/fs-writeback.c which queues
wb_writeback_work without checking whether the target wb
(bdi_writeback) has dirty inodes or not.  The only thing
wb_writeback_work does is writing back the dirty inodes for the target
wb and queueing a work item for a clean wb is essentially noop.  There
are some side effects such as bandwidth stats being updated and
triggering tracepoints but these don't affect the operation in any
meaningful way.

This patch makes all writeback_inodes_sb_nr() and sync_inodes_sb()
skip wb_queue_work() if the target bdi is clean.  Also, it moves
dirtiness check from wakeup_flusher_threads() to
__wb_start_writeback() so that all its callers benefit from the check.

While the overhead incurred by scheduling a noop work isn't currently
significant, the overhead may be higher with cgroup writeback support
as we may end up issuing noop work items to a lot of clean wb's.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
---
 fs/fs-writeback.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
index c98d392..921a9e4 100644
--- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -189,6 +189,9 @@ static void __wb_start_writeback(struct bdi_writeback *wb, long nr_pages,
 {
 	struct wb_writeback_work *work;
 
+	if (!wb_has_dirty_io(wb))
+		return;
+
 	/*
 	 * This is WB_SYNC_NONE writeback, so if allocation fails just
 	 * wakeup the thread for old dirty data writeback
@@ -1215,11 +1218,8 @@ void wakeup_flusher_threads(long nr_pages, enum wb_reason reason)
 		nr_pages = get_nr_dirty_pages();
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
-	list_for_each_entry_rcu(bdi, &bdi_list, bdi_list) {
-		if (!bdi_has_dirty_io(bdi))
-			continue;
+	list_for_each_entry_rcu(bdi, &bdi_list, bdi_list)
 		__wb_start_writeback(&bdi->wb, nr_pages, false, reason);
-	}
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 }
 
@@ -1512,11 +1512,12 @@ void writeback_inodes_sb_nr(struct super_block *sb,
 		.nr_pages		= nr,
 		.reason			= reason,
 	};
+	struct backing_dev_info *bdi = sb->s_bdi;
 
-	if (sb->s_bdi == &noop_backing_dev_info)
+	if (!bdi_has_dirty_io(bdi) || bdi == &noop_backing_dev_info)
 		return;
 	WARN_ON(!rwsem_is_locked(&sb->s_umount));
-	wb_queue_work(&sb->s_bdi->wb, &work);
+	wb_queue_work(&bdi->wb, &work);
 	wait_for_completion(&done);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(writeback_inodes_sb_nr);
@@ -1594,13 +1595,14 @@ void sync_inodes_sb(struct super_block *sb)
 		.reason		= WB_REASON_SYNC,
 		.for_sync	= 1,
 	};
+	struct backing_dev_info *bdi = sb->s_bdi;
 
 	/* Nothing to do? */
-	if (sb->s_bdi == &noop_backing_dev_info)
+	if (!bdi_has_dirty_io(bdi) || bdi == &noop_backing_dev_info)
 		return;
 	WARN_ON(!rwsem_is_locked(&sb->s_umount));
 
-	wb_queue_work(&sb->s_bdi->wb, &work);
+	wb_queue_work(&bdi->wb, &work);
 	wait_for_completion(&done);
 
 	wait_sb_inodes(sb);
-- 
2.4.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/