[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55606FFE.4000902@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 14:18:06 +0200
From: Corentin LABBE <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>
To: herbert@...dor.apana.org.au
CC: robh+dt@...nel.org, pawel.moll@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, galak@...eaurora.org,
maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com, linux@....linux.org.uk,
davem@...emloft.net, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, mchehab@....samsung.com,
joe@...ches.com, tj@...nel.org, arnd@...db.de,
boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v9 4/4] crypto: Add Allwinner Security
System crypto accelerator
Le 15/05/2015 08:49, Herbert Xu a écrit :
> On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 02:59:01PM +0200, LABBE Corentin wrote:
>>
>> + err = crypto_ablkcipher_setkey(op->fallback, kkey, op->keylen);
>> + if (err != 0) {
>> + dev_err(ss->dev, "Cannot set key on fallback\n");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>
> You cannot call setkey from an atomic context. The easiest solution
> is to call setkey in your setkey function instead.
>
> Cheers,
>
Fixed
What do you think about adding a BUG_ON(in_atomic()) in crypto_ablkcipher_setkey() ?
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists