[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <556097D5.9050103@codeaurora.org>
Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 10:08:05 -0500
From: Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
CC: fu.wei@...aro.org, Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com,
linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, tekkamanninja@...il.com,
graeme.gregory@...aro.org, al.stone@...aro.org,
ashwin.chaugule@...aro.org, linux@...ck-us.net,
vgandhi@...eaurora.org, wim@...ana.be, jcm@...hat.com,
leo.duran@....com, corbet@....net, mark.rutland@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] Watchdog: introduce ARM SBSA watchdog driver
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> I think it's a reasonable assumption that someone will sooner or later
> put that hardware into an ARM32 machine,
I'm going to have to disagree. If they haven't done it by now, I can't
imagine any ARM SOC vendor creating a 32-bit ARM SOC with an SBSA
watchdog in it. I can imagine a vendor trying to repurpose an existing
32-bit ARM SOC for the server market, but that SOC won't have an SBSA
watchdog in it.
> or run a 32-bit kernel on
> a chip that has it.
That might happen, but I would be very surprised, and I would need to be
convinced that it's useful.
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists