linux-kernel - Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [RFC 7/7] ARM: dts: sun9i: Add secure SRAM node used for MCPM SMP hotplug

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGb2v67+F_cnjHXgGwbewPODG=mLMPGaZCzvvLfXL=A3huceew@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 24 May 2015 23:55:22 +0800
From:	Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
To:	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
Cc:	Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
	Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
	Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>,
	Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [RFC 7/7] ARM: dts: sun9i: Add secure SRAM node
 used for MCPM SMP hotplug

On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 6:08 PM, Maxime Ripard
<maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 02:10:11PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>> The A80 stores some magic flags in a portion of the secure SRAM. The
>> BROM jumps directly to the software entry point set by the SMP code
>> if the flags are set. This is required for CPU0 hotplugging.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/sun9i-a80.dtsi | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun9i-a80.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun9i-a80.dtsi
>> index 1507bd2a88f0..0695215634d4 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun9i-a80.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun9i-a80.dtsi
>> @@ -366,6 +366,26 @@
>>                */
>>               ranges = <0 0 0 0x20000000>;
>>
>> +             sram_b: sram@...20000 {
>> +                     /* 256 KiB secure SRAM at 0x20000 */
>> +                     compatible = "mmio-sram";
>> +                     reg = <0x00020000 0x40000>;
>> +
>
> We should probably add a property to that SRAM to tell the driver not
> to access it if we're not booted in secure mode.

(CC-ing Heiko...)

That kind of puts architecture (ARM) dependent code into a platform
driver. Furthermore, AFAIK there isn't a safe way to check if we're
in secure mode or not. Checking SCR raises an undefined instruction
exception in non-secure mode. Can the kernel handle that? I really
don't understand this bit well.

> Otherwise, bad things might happen.

The kernel (or rather the bootloader) boots in secure mode by default,
and we don't have any bootloader support to boot into non-secure mode
ATM. Couldn't we have the bootloader mark the SRAM as disabled when
booting into non-secure when we add that support?


ChenYu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/