linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] Watchdog: introduce ARM SBSA watchdog driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CADyBb7tYL7ATRKNAoRYTXo53LKdCiFZ2YDib4g0nZ8=YxTgO+A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 25 May 2015 00:04:34 +0800
From:	Fu Wei <fu.wei@...aro.org>
To:	Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
	Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>,
	Linaro ACPI Mailman List <linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org>,
	linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	Wei Fu <tekkamanninja@...il.com>,
	G Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>,
	Al Stone <al.stone@...aro.org>,
	Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
	Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@...aro.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, vgandhi@...eaurora.org,
	wim@...ana.be, Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>,
	Leo Duran <leo.duran@....com>, Jon Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] Watchdog: introduce ARM SBSA watchdog driver

Hi Timur,

I have said this before:

in the first timeout, just panic()  maybe not enough,  in [RFC]
version of my patchset, I offer some option as "preaction" to use, but
for simplifying the first version of driver, I have deleted them.
but at least, panic() is far more useful than a simple reset.  at
least, it can provide the context of the crashed system  to admin.

If you want to warn user space, that will make driver more
complicated, I don't think that is a good choose for a first version.
but we can find a way to improve this later

On 24 May 2015 at 23:02, Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> Fu Wei wrote:
>>
>> If pretimeout concept assumes that there are two timers, I
>> misunderstand the "pretimeout", then I will delete the pretimeout
>> immediately.
>
>
> In my opinion, calling panic() on a pre-timeout is not useful, because
> that's really just a normal timeout.  If there were a way to "warn" user
> space that a timeout is about to occur, without a panic or reset, then that
> might be useful.  But as far as I can see, all you're doing is redefining
> the word "timeout".
>
>
> --
> Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the
> Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.



-- 
Best regards,

Fu Wei
Software Engineer
Red Hat Software (Beijing) Co.,Ltd.Shanghai Branch
Ph: +86 21 61221326(direct)
Ph: +86 186 2020 4684 (mobile)
Room 1512, Regus One Corporate Avenue,Level 15,
One Corporate Avenue,222 Hubin Road,Huangpu District,
Shanghai,China 200021
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/