linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] Watchdog: introduce ARM SBSA watchdog driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 25 May 2015 00:29:44 +0800
From:	Fu Wei <fu.wei@...aro.org>
To:	Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
	Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>,
	Linaro ACPI Mailman List <linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org>,
	linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	Wei Fu <tekkamanninja@...il.com>,
	G Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>,
	Al Stone <al.stone@...aro.org>,
	Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
	Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@...aro.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, vgandhi@...eaurora.org,
	wim@...ana.be, Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>,
	Leo Duran <leo.duran@....com>, Jon Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] Watchdog: introduce ARM SBSA watchdog driver

Hi Timur,

Sorry,  how do you trigger a panic if WS1 ties to reset ?? don't know
what is your question

could you make it simple:

1) calling panic() on pre-timeout (WS0????)
2) calling panic() on timeout (WS1????)

in "first version" , I just print the timeleft for WS1 or panic  when
WS0 occurs.

On 25 May 2015 at 00:13, Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> Fu Wei wrote:
>>
>> in the first timeout, just panic()  maybe not enough,  in [RFC]
>> version of my patchset, I offer some option as "preaction" to use, but
>> for simplifying the first version of driver, I have deleted them.
>> but at least, panic() is far more useful than a simple reset.  at
>> least, it can provide the context of the crashed system  to admin.
>
>
> My point is that there is very little difference between
>
> 1) calling panic() on pre-timeout
> 2) calling panic() on timeout
>
> In both cases, the system will panic.  The watchdog API says that the system
> should reset when a timeout occurs, so you cannot call panic() before the
> timeout expires.
>
>> If you want to warn user space, that will make driver more
>> complicated, I don't think that is a good choose for a first version.
>> but we can find a way to improve this later
>
> In my opinion, this "first version" is not useful.  I would like to see a
> pre-timeout feature that does not panic or reset when a pre-timeout occurs.
>
>
> --
> Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the
> Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.



-- 
Best regards,

Fu Wei
Software Engineer
Red Hat Software (Beijing) Co.,Ltd.Shanghai Branch
Ph: +86 21 61221326(direct)
Ph: +86 186 2020 4684 (mobile)
Room 1512, Regus One Corporate Avenue,Level 15,
One Corporate Avenue,222 Hubin Road,Huangpu District,
Shanghai,China 200021
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/