[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5561FFF0.5090108@codeaurora.org>
Date: Sun, 24 May 2015 11:44:32 -0500
From: Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, Fu Wei <fu.wei@...aro.org>
CC: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>,
Linaro ACPI Mailman List <linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org>,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Wei Fu <tekkamanninja@...il.com>,
G Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>,
Al Stone <al.stone@...aro.org>,
Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@...aro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, vgandhi@...eaurora.org,
wim@...ana.be, Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>,
Leo Duran <leo.duran@....com>, Jon Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] Watchdog: introduce ARM SBSA watchdog driver
Guenter Roeck wrote:
> The current watchdog API suggests that the pretimeout "allows Linux
> to record useful information (like panic information and kernel
> coredumps) before it resets". The call to panic() would be the
> means to make this happen.
Now that I think about it, that does make sense.
However, if a pre-timeout is not set, then the driver should never call
panic(). That means that the interrupt handler should only be
registered if sbsa_gwdt_set_pretimeout() is called.
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists