[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55620EA1.3070605@codeaurora.org>
Date: Sun, 24 May 2015 12:47:13 -0500
From: Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, Fu Wei <fu.wei@...aro.org>
CC: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>,
Linaro ACPI Mailman List <linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org>,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Wei Fu <tekkamanninja@...il.com>,
G Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>,
Al Stone <al.stone@...aro.org>,
Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@...aro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, vgandhi@...eaurora.org,
wim@...ana.be, Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>,
Leo Duran <leo.duran@....com>, Jon Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] Watchdog: introduce ARM SBSA watchdog driver
Guenter Roeck wrote:
>
> The pseudo-code in the specification suggests that if WCV is configured,
> WS0 = WCV
> WS1 = WCV + WOR
>
> Assuming that the implementation follows the pseudo-code in the
> specification,
> we would have separately programmable values. Since the pretimeout (per
> ABI)
> is the difference in seconds to the timeout, and not an absolute value,
> we would have to program the registers as follows.
>
> WCV = timeout - pretimeout;
> WOR = pretimeout;
>
> Does this make sense ?
Yes, thank you. I will test this on my hardware.
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists