[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150524071948.GA20923@kroah.com>
Date: Sun, 24 May 2015 00:19:48 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
Cc: heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, david.a.cohen@...ux.intel.com,
balbi@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: ulpi: don't register drivers if bus doesn't exist
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 03:33:26PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> ULPI registers it's bus at module_init so if the bus fails to register, the
> module will fail to load and all will be well in the world.
>
> However, if the ULPI code is built-in rather than a module, the bus
> initialization may fail but we'd still try to register drivers later onto
> a non-existant bus, which will panic the kernel.
>
> Fix that by checking that the bus was indeed initialized before trying to
> register drivers on top of it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
> ---
> drivers/usb/common/ulpi.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/common/ulpi.c b/drivers/usb/common/ulpi.c
> index 0e6f968..0b0a5e7 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/common/ulpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/common/ulpi.c
> @@ -132,6 +132,10 @@ int ulpi_register_driver(struct ulpi_driver *drv)
> if (!drv->probe)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> + /* Was the bus registered successfully? */
> + if (!ulpi_bus.p)
> + return -ENODEV;
Ick, no, don't go mucking around in the bus internals like this, that's
not ok. You should either "know" the bus is registered, or something is
really wrong with the design here.
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists