linux-kernel - [RFC PATCH v2 05/15] perf tools: Add pt_regs offsets and calling regs for x86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1432456091-73384-6-git-send-email-hekuang@huawei.com>
Date:	Sun, 24 May 2015 08:28:01 +0000
From:	He Kuang <hekuang@...wei.com>
To:	<wangnan0@...wei.com>, <paulus@...ba.org>,
	<a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, <mingo@...hat.com>, <acme@...nel.org>,
	<namhyung@...nel.org>, <jolsa@...nel.org>, <ast@...mgrid.com>,
	<masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>, <dsahern@...il.com>,
	<brendan.d.gregg@...il.com>, <daniel@...earbox.net>
CC:	<lizefan@...wei.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 05/15] perf tools: Add pt_regs offsets and calling regs for x86

Combine pt_regs offset of each registers into arch_regs_table. And add
architecture dependent calling_regs_table.

Signed-off-by: He Kuang <hekuang@...wei.com>
---
 tools/perf/arch/x86/util/dwarf-regs.c | 100 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 79 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/dwarf-regs.c b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/dwarf-regs.c
index be22dd4..c7f2309 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/dwarf-regs.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/dwarf-regs.c
@@ -22,54 +22,112 @@
 
 #include <stddef.h>
 #include <dwarf-regs.h>
+#include <string.h>
+#include <linux/ptrace.h>
 
 /*
  * Generic dwarf analysis helpers
  */
 
+#ifndef __x86_64__
 #define X86_32_MAX_REGS 8
-const char *x86_32_regs_table[X86_32_MAX_REGS] = {
-	"%ax",
+const struct arch_regs_info x86_32_regs_table[X86_32_MAX_REGS] = {
+	ARCH_REGS_INFO("%ax",		eax),
+	ARCH_REGS_INFO("%cx",		ecx),
+	ARCH_REGS_INFO("%dx",		edx),
+	ARCH_REGS_INFO("%bx",		ebx),
+	ARCH_REGS_INFO("$stack",	esp), /* Stack address instead of %sp */
+	ARCH_REGS_INFO("%bp",		ebp),
+	ARCH_REGS_INFO("%si",		esi),
+	ARCH_REGS_INFO("%di",		edi),
+};
+
+#define X86_32_MAX_CALLING_REGS	(2)
+const char *x86_32_calling_regs_table[] = {
 	"%cx",
 	"%dx",
-	"%bx",
-	"$stack",	/* Stack address instead of %sp */
-	"%bp",
-	"%si",
-	"%di",
 };
 
+#else
 #define X86_64_MAX_REGS 16
-const char *x86_64_regs_table[X86_64_MAX_REGS] = {
-	"%ax",
+const struct arch_regs_info x86_64_regs_table[X86_64_MAX_REGS] = {
+	ARCH_REGS_INFO("%ax",		rax),
+	ARCH_REGS_INFO("%dx",		rdx),
+	ARCH_REGS_INFO("%cx",		rcx),
+	ARCH_REGS_INFO("%bx",		rbx),
+	ARCH_REGS_INFO("%si",		rsi),
+	ARCH_REGS_INFO("%di",		rdi),
+	ARCH_REGS_INFO("%bp",		rbp),
+	ARCH_REGS_INFO("%sp",		rsp),
+	ARCH_REGS_INFO("%r8",		r8),
+	ARCH_REGS_INFO("%r9",		r9),
+	ARCH_REGS_INFO("%r10",		r10),
+	ARCH_REGS_INFO("%r11",		r11),
+	ARCH_REGS_INFO("%r12",		r12),
+	ARCH_REGS_INFO("%r13",		r13),
+	ARCH_REGS_INFO("%r14",		r14),
+	ARCH_REGS_INFO("%r15",		r15),
+};
+
+#define X86_64_MAX_CALLING_REGS	(6)
+const char *x86_64_calling_regs_table[] = {
+	"%di",
+	"%si",
 	"%dx",
 	"%cx",
-	"%bx",
-	"%si",
-	"%di",
-	"%bp",
-	"%sp",
 	"%r8",
 	"%r9",
-	"%r10",
-	"%r11",
-	"%r12",
-	"%r13",
-	"%r14",
-	"%r15",
 };
 
+#endif
+
 /* TODO: switching by dwarf address size */
 #ifdef __x86_64__
 #define ARCH_MAX_REGS X86_64_MAX_REGS
 #define arch_regs_table x86_64_regs_table
+#define ARCH_MAX_CALLING_REGS X86_64_MAX_CALLING_REGS
+#define arch_calling_regs_table x86_64_calling_regs_table
 #else
 #define ARCH_MAX_REGS X86_32_MAX_REGS
 #define arch_regs_table x86_32_regs_table
+#define ARCH_MAX_CALLING_REGS X86_32_MAX_CALLING_REGS
+#define arch_calling_regs_table x86_32_calling_regs_table
 #endif
 
 /* Return architecture dependent register string (for kprobe-tracer) */
 const char *get_arch_regstr(unsigned int n)
 {
-	return (n <= ARCH_MAX_REGS) ? arch_regs_table[n] : NULL;
+	return (n < ARCH_MAX_REGS) ? arch_regs_table[n].name : NULL;
+}
+
+int get_arch_reg_offset(unsigned int n)
+{
+	return (n < ARCH_MAX_REGS) ? arch_regs_table[n].offset : -1;
+}
+
+int get_arch_reg_size(unsigned int n)
+{
+	return (n < ARCH_MAX_REGS) ? arch_regs_table[n].size : -1;
+}
+
+const char *get_arch_calling_reg_str(unsigned int n)
+{
+	return (n < ARCH_MAX_CALLING_REGS) ?
+		arch_calling_regs_table[n] : NULL;
+}
+
+int get_arch_calling_reg_offset(unsigned int n)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	if (n >= ARCH_MAX_CALLING_REGS)
+		return -1;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < ARCH_MAX_REGS; i++) {
+		if (!strcmp(arch_calling_regs_table[n],
+				arch_regs_table[i].name))
+			return arch_regs_table[i].offset;
+	}
+
+	return -1;
 }
-- 
1.8.5.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/