linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 06/11] md/raid5: get rid of bio_fits

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150525175414.6a1fc33d@notabene.brown>
Date:	Mon, 25 May 2015 17:54:14 +1000
From:	NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
To:	Ming Lin <mlin@...nel.org>
Cc:	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Dongsu Park <dpark@...teo.net>,
	linux-raid@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/11] md/raid5: get rid of bio_fits_rdev()

On Mon, 25 May 2015 00:03:20 -0700 Ming Lin <mlin@...nel.org> wrote:

> On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 10:48 PM, NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de> wrote:
> > On Fri, 22 May 2015 11:18:38 -0700 Ming Lin <mlin@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> >> From: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>
> >>
> >> Remove bio_fits_rdev() completely, because ->merge_bvec_fn() has now
> >> gone. There's no point in calling bio_fits_rdev() only for ensuring
> >> aligned read from rdev.
> >
> > Surely this patch should come *before*
> >   [PATCH v4 07/11] md/raid5: split bio for chunk_aligned_read
> 
> PATCH 6, then PATCH 7, isn't it already *before*?

Did I write that?  I guess I did :-(
I meant *after*.   Don't get rid of bio_fits_rdev until split_bio is in
chunk_aligned_read().

Sorry.

> 
> >
> > and the comment says ->merge_bvec_fn() has gone, but that isn't until
> >   [PATCH v4 08/11] block: kill merge_bvec_fn() completely
> >
> >
> > If those issues are resolved, then
> 
> How about this?
> 
> PATCH 6: md/raid5: split bio for chunk_aligned_read
> PATCH 7: block: kill merge_bvec_fn() completely
> PATCH 8: md/raid5: get rid of bio_fits_rdev()

Yes for "get rid of bio_fits_rdev()" after "split bio for chunk_aligned_read".

For the other issue, you could do was you suggest, or you could just change
the comment.
  Remove bio_fits_rdev() as sufficient merge_bvec_fn() handling is now
  performed by blk_queue_split() in md_make_request().

Up to you.

Thanks,
NeilBrown


> 
> Thanks.
> 
> >
> >   Acked-by: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > NeilBrown
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>
> >> Cc: linux-raid@...r.kernel.org
> >> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>
> >> [dpark: add more description in commit message]
> >> Signed-off-by: Dongsu Park <dpark@...teo.net>
> >> Signed-off-by: Ming Lin <mlin@...nel.org>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/md/raid5.c | 23 +----------------------
> >>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 22 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
> >> index 1ba97fd..b303ded 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
> >> @@ -4743,25 +4743,6 @@ static void raid5_align_endio(struct bio *bi, int error)
> >>       add_bio_to_retry(raid_bi, conf);
> >>  }
> >>
> >> -static int bio_fits_rdev(struct bio *bi)
> >> -{
> >> -     struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(bi->bi_bdev);
> >> -
> >> -     if (bio_sectors(bi) > queue_max_sectors(q))
> >> -             return 0;
> >> -     blk_recount_segments(q, bi);
> >> -     if (bi->bi_phys_segments > queue_max_segments(q))
> >> -             return 0;
> >> -
> >> -     if (q->merge_bvec_fn)
> >> -             /* it's too hard to apply the merge_bvec_fn at this stage,
> >> -              * just just give up
> >> -              */
> >> -             return 0;
> >> -
> >> -     return 1;
> >> -}
> >> -
> >>  static int chunk_aligned_read(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio * raid_bio)
> >>  {
> >>       struct r5conf *conf = mddev->private;
> >> @@ -4815,11 +4796,9 @@ static int chunk_aligned_read(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio * raid_bio)
> >>               align_bi->bi_bdev =  rdev->bdev;
> >>               __clear_bit(BIO_SEG_VALID, &align_bi->bi_flags);
> >>
> >> -             if (!bio_fits_rdev(align_bi) ||
> >> -                 is_badblock(rdev, align_bi->bi_iter.bi_sector,
> >> +             if (is_badblock(rdev, align_bi->bi_iter.bi_sector,
> >>                               bio_sectors(align_bi),
> >>                               &first_bad, &bad_sectors)) {
> >> -                     /* too big in some way, or has a known bad block */
> >>                       bio_put(align_bi);
> >>                       rdev_dec_pending(rdev, mddev);
> >>                       return 0;
> >
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped