[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150525124133.GF9943@amd>
Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 14:41:33 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>
To: Alan Tull <atull@...nsource.altera.com>
Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nsource.altera.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Steffen Trumtrar <s.trumtrar@...gutronix.de>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Delicious Quinoq <delicious.quinoa@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] ARM: socfpga: support suspend to ram
Hi!
> Suspend-to-RAM and EDAC support are mutually exclusive on SOCFPGA
> platforms. CONFIG_SOCFPGA_SUSPEND enables suspend-to-RAM and
> prevents selecting CONFIG_EDAC_ALTERA_MC.
Do we went to have the dependency at the .config time? We would like
to do generic kernels booting on many machines, this kind of breaks
that...
> + /*
> + * This code assumes that the bootloader has already
> + * properly configured the sdram controller:
Which bootloaders can do that?
> + * sdr.ctrlcfg.lowpwreq.selfrfshmask = 3
> + * sdr.ctrlcfg.lowpwrtiming.clkdisablecycles = 8
> + * sdr.ctrlcfg.dramtiming4.selfrfshexit = 512
Would it make sense to configure it in Linux?
Thanks,
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists