[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150525144014.GC23037@pali>
Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 16:40:14 +0200
From: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
To: Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: dell_rbtn - kernel panic at boot...
On Sunday 24 May 2015 21:44:32 Darren Hart wrote:
> On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 03:05:36AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Saturday 23 May 2015 00:53:16 Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Valdis Kletnieks
> > >
> > > <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu> wrote:
> > > > So after I made both config variables =y, the resulting kernel
> > > > built, but died a glorious death at boot.
> > >
> > > I guess if both are built-in then, according to link order,
> > > dell-laptop starts first, before dell-rbtn, and dies in
> > > dell_rbtn_notifier_register() in call to
> > > driver_for_each_device(&rbtn_driver.drv, ...) because rbtn_driver has
> > > not been registered yet and thus half-initlalized.
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> >
> > pr_debug() messages could be useful... but no idea if we can get them.
> >
> > Is there any way to fix that dependency race condition? Could
> > driver_attach() function call help?
>
> I believe you can avoid this by moving dell-rbtn earlier in the Makefile than
> dell-laptop - but this is fragile and a hack to resolve a dependency problem.
>
And what about that late_initcall() instead module_init() in dell-laptop?
Will it fix this problem?
--
Pali Rohár
pali.rohar@...il.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists