linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl_spdif: Don't try to round-up for clock divisor calculation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150525151127.GA8184@Asurada>
Date:	Mon, 25 May 2015 08:11:27 -0700
From:	Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:	alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lgirdwood@...il.com,
	fabio.estevam@...escale.com, zidan.wang@...escale.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl_spdif: Don't try to round-up for clock divisor
 calculation

On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 12:58:12PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 01:12:41AM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> > As commit 6c8ca30eec7b ("ASoC: fsl_ssi: Don't try to round-up for PM
> > divisor calculation") mentioned that there's no more need to use a
> > round up work around to get a better divisor since the clk-divider
> > driver has been refined a lot.
> 
> Applied, thanks.

Hi Mark,

Is that possible for you to provisionally revert this patch?
I wanted to wait for the test result from Fabio or Zidan in
the Cc list because I don't have a test environment for SPDIF
even though this change seems to make sense.

Thank you
Nicolin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/