[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55633EAC.8060702@suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 17:24:28 +0200
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
CC: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hugetlb: Do not account hugetlb pages as NR_FILE_PAGES
On 05/22/2015 04:35 PM, Mel Gorman wrote:
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> > This makes a lot of sense to me. The only thing I worry about is the
>> > proliferation of PageHuge(), a function call, in relatively hot paths.
>>
>> I've tried that (see the patch below) but it enlarged the code by almost
>> 1k
>> text data bss dec hex filename
>> 510323 74273 44440 629036 9992c mm/built-in.o.before
>> 511248 74273 44440 629961 99cc9 mm/built-in.o.after
>>
>> I am not sure the code size increase is worth it. Maybe we can reduce
>> the check to only PageCompound(page) as huge pages are no in the page
>> cache (yet).
>>
>
> That would be a more sensible route because it also avoids exposing the
> hugetlbfs destructor unnecessarily.
You could maybe do test such as (PageCompound(page) && PageHuge(page)) to
short-circuit the call while remaining future-proof.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists