linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] Documentation: dmaengine: document DMA_CTRL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150525165257.GI3140@localhost>
Date:	Mon, 25 May 2015 22:22:57 +0530
From:	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
To:	Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
Cc:	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
	Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
	dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] Documentation: dmaengine: document DMA_CTRL_ACK

On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 10:31:39PM +0200, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com> writes:
> 
> > Hi Robert,
> >
> >>    * DMA_CTRL_ACK
> >> -    - Undocumented feature
> >> -    - No one really has an idea of what it's about, besides being
> >> -      related to reusing the DMA transaction descriptors or having
> >> -      additional transactions added to it in the async-tx API
> >> -    - Useless in the case of the slave API
> >> +    - if set, the TX transfer can be reused after being completed.
> >
> > Your sentences should start with an upper-case letter.
> Ack.
> 
> >> +    - there is a guarantee the TX won't be freed until it is acked
> >> +      by async_tx_ack()
> >
> > We never talked about what a "TX transfer" is in the
> > documentation. That should be documented.
> I'll remove the "TX", the transfer is widely used in this documentation.
> 
> >
> >> +    - as a consequence, if a device driver wants to skip the dma_map_sg() and
> >> +      dma_unmap_sg() because the DMA'd data wasn't used, it can resubmit the
> >> +      transfer right after its completion.
> >
> > From a provider PoV, the data should always be mapped and / or
> > allocated in coherent way, so I'm not sure how does that's relevant in
> > the provider doc.
> It's relevant because it says the mapping/unmapping is not necessary _between_ 2
> submission of a transfer. This implies it is mapped, as it is a requirement for
> the very first submission.
> 
> > Also, we should still mention that it's !slave API only.
> Certainly not, it's fully slave API, that's the purpose of this patch.
Its is not dependent on slave, it cna be used by slave as well as other
users

-- 
~Vinod

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/