linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf: fix wrong DEBUG configuration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150525183246.GA21153@gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 25 May 2015 20:32:46 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:	Martin Liška <mliska@...e.cz>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: fix wrong DEBUG configuration


* Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org> wrote:

> Em Mon, May 25, 2015 at 01:12:44PM +0200, Martin Liška escreveu:
> > On 05/25/2015 01:09 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > >* Martin Liška <mliska@...e.cz> wrote:
> > >
> > >>>>Right optimize debugging experience is given by passing -Og to
> > >>>>compiler. Assign default value for pointers that are identified by
> > >>>>compiler as non-initialized.
> > >>>
> > >>>s/Right optimize debugging experience is given/
> > >>>   Correct debugging experience is given/
> > >
> > >>Right debugging experience is given by passing -Og to compiler.
> > >
> > >So I fixed the spelling here once already :-/ If you want to use
> > >'right' in this context then use it like this:
> > >
> > >   The right debugging experience is given by ...
> > >
> > >Or you can use what I suggested first:
> > >
> > >   Correct debugging experience is given by ...
> > >
> > >Thanks,
> > >
> > >	Ingo
> > >
> > 
> > Sorry Ingo for that, I overlooked that correction :)
> 
> Are you ok with this Ingo?

Yeah, certainly!

> I can apply, but there seems to be two patches folded here, one that 
> sets the possibly unitiliazed variables to NULL, and could be the 
> first in the series, and the other, that deals with multiple 
> versions of gcc and how should we ask something from them.

Yeah.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/