linux-kernel - Re: Device Tree Blob (DTB) licence

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOS_Y6Q37ps+VEnzUZ_uwX++qrRm9Hgx45Q_pmiZSLSNjmKwZg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 25 May 2015 02:14:28 -0500
From:	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
To:	Yann Droneaud <ydroneaud@...eya.com>
Cc:	Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Device Tree Blob (DTB) licence

On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Yann Droneaud <ydroneaud@...eya.com> wrote:
> I've added licensing@....ogrg in Cc: in my previous message to have an
> advice on this subject, but I failed to notice licensing@....org
> is not a mailing list: I was assigned request ID [gnu.org #1017262].
>
> Regards.

They're also not an unbiased source. Their job is to reply "you should
license it under GPLv3" without actually looking at your message.
(This is a slight oversimplification, they may instead recomend the
GFDL. They will never _not_ recommend one of their licenses.)

Personally, I'm sad we're starting to get ACPI for arm but if device
tree data files are only available under GPL, people will hold their
nose and deploy ACPI.

Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/