[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150526102219.GB13750@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 11:22:19 +0100
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@....com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Waiman Long <waiman.long@...com>,
Scott Norton <scott.norton@...com>,
Daniel J Blueman <daniel@...ascale.com>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/13] mm: meminit: Only set page reserved in the
memblock region
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 01:31:55PM -0700, Tony Luck wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 7:37 AM, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de> wrote:
> > Currently each page struct is set as reserved upon initialization.
> > This patch leaves the reserved bit clear and only sets the reserved bit
> > when it is known the memory was allocated by the bootmem allocator. This
> > makes it easier to distinguish between uninitialised struct pages and
> > reserved struct pages in later patches.
>
> On ia64 my linux-next builds now report a bunch of messages like this:
>
> put_kernel_page: page at 0xe000000005588000 not in reserved memory
> put_kernel_page: page at 0xe000000005588000 not in reserved memory
> put_kernel_page: page at 0xe000000005580000 not in reserved memory
> put_kernel_page: page at 0xe000000005580000 not in reserved memory
> put_kernel_page: page at 0xe000000005580000 not in reserved memory
> put_kernel_page: page at 0xe000000005580000 not in reserved memory
>
> the two different pages match up with two objects from the loaded kernel
> that get mapped by arch/ia64/mm/init.c:setup_gate()
>
> a000000101588000 D __start_gate_section
> a000000101580000 D empty_zero_page
>
> Should I look for a place to set the reserved bit on page structures for these
> addresses?
That would be preferred.
> Or just remove the test and message in put_kernel_page()
> [I added a debug "else" clause here - every caller passes in a page that is
> not reserved]
>
> if (!PageReserved(page))
> printk(KERN_ERR "put_kernel_page: page at 0x%p not in
> reserved memory\n",
> page_address(page));
>
But as it's a debugging check that is ia-64 specific I think either
should be fine.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists