lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 26 May 2015 10:52:43 +0800
From:	yalin wang <yalin.wang2010@...il.com>
To:	Jungseok Lee <jungseoklee85@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, barami97@...il.com,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] arm64: Implement vmalloc based thread_info allocator

2015-05-25 0:02 GMT+08:00 Jungseok Lee <jungseoklee85@...il.com>:
> Fork-routine sometimes fails to get a physically contiguous region for
> thread_info on 4KB page system although free memory is enough. That is,
> a physically contiguous region, which is currently 16KB, is not available
> since system memory is fragmented.
>
> This patch tries to solve the problem as allocating thread_info memory
> from vmalloc space, not 1:1 mapping one. The downside is one additional
> page allocation in case of vmalloc. However, vmalloc space is large enough,
> around 240GB, under a combination of 39-bit VA and 4KB page. Thus, it is
> not a big tradeoff for fork-routine service.
>
> Suggested-by: Sungjinn Chung <barami97@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jungseok Lee <jungseoklee85@...il.com>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org
> ---
>  arch/arm64/Kconfig                   | 12 ++++++++++++
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h |  9 +++++++++
>  arch/arm64/kernel/process.c          |  7 +++++++
>  3 files changed, 28 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> index 99930cf..93c236a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> @@ -536,6 +536,18 @@ config ARCH_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL
>  config HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID
>         def_bool ARCH_HAS_HOLES_MEMORYMODEL || !SPARSEMEM
>
> +config ARCH_THREAD_INFO_ALLOCATOR
> +       bool "Enable vmalloc based thread_info allocator (EXPERIMENTAL)"
> +       depends on ARM64_4K_PAGES
> +       default n
> +       help
> +         This feature enables vmalloc based thread_info allocator. It
> +         prevents fork-routine from begin failed to obtain physically
> +         contiguour region due to memory fragmentation on low system
> +         memory platforms.
> +
> +         If unsure, say N
> +
>  config HW_PERF_EVENTS
>         bool "Enable hardware performance counter support for perf events"
>         depends on PERF_EVENTS
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
> index dcd06d1..e753e59 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
> @@ -61,6 +61,15 @@ struct thread_info {
>  #define init_thread_info       (init_thread_union.thread_info)
>  #define init_stack             (init_thread_union.stack)
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_THREAD_INFO_ALLOCATOR
> +#define alloc_thread_info_node(tsk, node)                              \
> +({                                                                     \
> +       __vmalloc_node_range(THREAD_SIZE, THREAD_SIZE, VMALLOC_START,   \
> +                       VMALLOC_END, GFP_KERNEL, PAGE_KERNEL, 0,        \
> +                       NUMA_NO_NODE, __builtin_return_address(0));     \
> +})
why not add __GFP_HIGHMEM, if you decided to use vmalloc() alloc stack pages?

Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists