| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1432644564-24746-9-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 20:49:21 +0800
From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Yijing Wang <wangyijing@...wei.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com>,
Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@...aro.org>,
Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>,
Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org,
Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 08/11] x86, pci, ecam: mmconfig_64.c becomes default implementation for ECAM driver.
From: Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@...aro.org>
Host which want to take advantage of ECAM generic goodness
should select CONFIG_PCI_ECAM_GENERIC. Otherwise, machines like 32bits x86,
are obligated to provide own low-level ECAM calls.
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
Tested-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>
---
arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 +
arch/x86/pci/Makefile | 4 +-
arch/x86/pci/mmconfig_64.c | 127 ---------------------------------------------
drivers/pci/Kconfig | 3 ++
drivers/pci/ecam.c | 113 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
5 files changed, 120 insertions(+), 128 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 arch/x86/pci/mmconfig_64.c
diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
index 4e3dcb3..87a6393 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
@@ -144,6 +144,7 @@ config X86
select X86_FEATURE_NAMES if PROC_FS
select SRCU
select HAVE_PCI_ECAM
+ select GENERIC_PCI_ECAM if X86_64
config INSTRUCTION_DECODER
def_bool y
diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/Makefile b/arch/x86/pci/Makefile
index 5c6fc35..efc193d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/pci/Makefile
+++ b/arch/x86/pci/Makefile
@@ -1,7 +1,9 @@
obj-y := i386.o init.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_BIOS) += pcbios.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_MMCONFIG) += mmconfig_$(BITS).o direct.o mmconfig-shared.o
+mmconfig-y := direct.o mmconfig-shared.o
+mmconfig-$(CONFIG_X86_32) += mmconfig_32.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_MMCONFIG) += $(mmconfig-y)
obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_DIRECT) += direct.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_OLPC) += olpc.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_XEN) += xen.o
diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/mmconfig_64.c b/arch/x86/pci/mmconfig_64.c
deleted file mode 100644
index fd857ea..0000000
--- a/arch/x86/pci/mmconfig_64.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,127 +0,0 @@
-/*
- * mmconfig.c - Low-level direct PCI config space access via MMCONFIG
- *
- * This is an 64bit optimized version that always keeps the full mmconfig
- * space mapped. This allows lockless config space operation.
- */
-
-#include <linux/pci.h>
-#include <linux/init.h>
-#include <linux/acpi.h>
-#include <linux/bitmap.h>
-#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
-#include <linux/ecam.h>
-#include <asm/e820.h>
-#include <asm/pci_x86.h>
-
-#define PREFIX "PCI: "
-
-static char __iomem *pci_dev_base(unsigned int seg, unsigned int bus, unsigned int devfn)
-{
- struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg = pci_mmconfig_lookup(seg, bus);
-
- if (cfg && cfg->virt)
- return cfg->virt + (PCI_MMCFG_BUS_OFFSET(bus) | (devfn << 12));
- return NULL;
-}
-
-int pci_mmcfg_read(unsigned int seg, unsigned int bus,
- unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 *value)
-{
- char __iomem *addr;
-
- /* Why do we have this when nobody checks it. How about a BUG()!? -AK */
- if (unlikely((bus > 255) || (devfn > 255) || (reg > 4095))) {
-err: *value = -1;
- return -EINVAL;
- }
-
- rcu_read_lock();
- addr = pci_dev_base(seg, bus, devfn);
- if (!addr) {
- rcu_read_unlock();
- goto err;
- }
-
- *value = pci_mmio_read(len, addr + reg);
- rcu_read_unlock();
-
- return 0;
-}
-
-int pci_mmcfg_write(unsigned int seg, unsigned int bus,
- unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 value)
-{
- char __iomem *addr;
-
- /* Why do we have this when nobody checks it. How about a BUG()!? -AK */
- if (unlikely((bus > 255) || (devfn > 255) || (reg > 4095)))
- return -EINVAL;
-
- rcu_read_lock();
- addr = pci_dev_base(seg, bus, devfn);
- if (!addr) {
- rcu_read_unlock();
- return -EINVAL;
- }
-
- pci_mmio_write(len, addr + reg, value);
- rcu_read_unlock();
-
- return 0;
-}
-
-static void __iomem *mcfg_ioremap(struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg)
-{
- void __iomem *addr;
- u64 start, size;
- int num_buses;
-
- start = cfg->address + PCI_MMCFG_BUS_OFFSET(cfg->start_bus);
- num_buses = cfg->end_bus - cfg->start_bus + 1;
- size = PCI_MMCFG_BUS_OFFSET(num_buses);
- addr = ioremap_nocache(start, size);
- if (addr)
- addr -= PCI_MMCFG_BUS_OFFSET(cfg->start_bus);
- return addr;
-}
-
-int __init pci_mmcfg_arch_init(void)
-{
- struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg;
-
- list_for_each_entry(cfg, &pci_mmcfg_list, list)
- if (pci_mmcfg_arch_map(cfg)) {
- pci_mmcfg_arch_free();
- return 0;
- }
-
- return 1;
-}
-
-void __init pci_mmcfg_arch_free(void)
-{
- struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg;
-
- list_for_each_entry(cfg, &pci_mmcfg_list, list)
- pci_mmcfg_arch_unmap(cfg);
-}
-
-int pci_mmcfg_arch_map(struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg)
-{
- cfg->virt = mcfg_ioremap(cfg);
- if (!cfg->virt) {
- pr_err(PREFIX "can't map MMCONFIG at %pR\n", &cfg->res);
- return -ENOMEM;
- }
-
- return 0;
-}
-
-void pci_mmcfg_arch_unmap(struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg)
-{
- if (cfg && cfg->virt) {
- iounmap(cfg->virt + PCI_MMCFG_BUS_OFFSET(cfg->start_bus));
- cfg->virt = NULL;
- }
-}
diff --git a/drivers/pci/Kconfig b/drivers/pci/Kconfig
index 90a5fb9..fae4aa7 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/pci/Kconfig
@@ -29,6 +29,9 @@ config PCI_ECAM
config HAVE_PCI_ECAM
bool
+config GENERIC_PCI_ECAM
+ bool
+
config PCI_DEBUG
bool "PCI Debugging"
depends on PCI && DEBUG_KERNEL
diff --git a/drivers/pci/ecam.c b/drivers/pci/ecam.c
index c588234..796b6e7 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/ecam.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/ecam.c
@@ -23,6 +23,119 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(pci_mmcfg_lock);
LIST_HEAD(pci_mmcfg_list);
+#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_PCI_ECAM
+static char __iomem *pci_dev_base(unsigned int seg, unsigned int bus,
+ unsigned int devfn)
+{
+ struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg = pci_mmconfig_lookup(seg, bus);
+
+ if (cfg && cfg->virt)
+ return cfg->virt + (PCI_MMCFG_BUS_OFFSET(bus) | (devfn << 12));
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+int pci_mmcfg_read(unsigned int seg, unsigned int bus,
+ unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 *value)
+{
+ char __iomem *addr;
+
+ /* Why do we have this when nobody checks it. How about a BUG()!? -AK */
+ if (unlikely((bus > 255) || (devfn > 255) || (reg > 4095))) {
+err: *value = -1;
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ addr = pci_dev_base(seg, bus, devfn);
+ if (!addr) {
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+ *value = pci_mmio_read(len, addr + reg);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int pci_mmcfg_write(unsigned int seg, unsigned int bus,
+ unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 value)
+{
+ char __iomem *addr;
+
+ /* Why do we have this when nobody checks it. How about a BUG()!? -AK */
+ if (unlikely((bus > 255) || (devfn > 255) || (reg > 4095)))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ addr = pci_dev_base(seg, bus, devfn);
+ if (!addr) {
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ pci_mmio_write(len, addr + reg, value);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void __iomem *mcfg_ioremap(struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg)
+{
+ void __iomem *addr;
+ u64 start, size;
+ int num_buses;
+
+ start = cfg->address + PCI_MMCFG_BUS_OFFSET(cfg->start_bus);
+ num_buses = cfg->end_bus - cfg->start_bus + 1;
+ size = PCI_MMCFG_BUS_OFFSET(num_buses);
+ addr = ioremap_nocache(start, size);
+ if (addr)
+ addr -= PCI_MMCFG_BUS_OFFSET(cfg->start_bus);
+ return addr;
+}
+
+int __init pci_mmcfg_arch_init(void)
+{
+ struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg;
+
+ list_for_each_entry(cfg, &pci_mmcfg_list, list)
+ if (pci_mmcfg_arch_map(cfg)) {
+ pci_mmcfg_arch_free();
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ return 1;
+}
+
+void __init pci_mmcfg_arch_free(void)
+{
+ struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg;
+
+ list_for_each_entry(cfg, &pci_mmcfg_list, list)
+ pci_mmcfg_arch_unmap(cfg);
+}
+
+int pci_mmcfg_arch_map(struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg)
+{
+ cfg->virt = mcfg_ioremap(cfg);
+ if (!cfg->virt) {
+ pr_err(PREFIX "can't map MMCONFIG at %pR\n", &cfg->res);
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+void pci_mmcfg_arch_unmap(struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg)
+{
+ if (cfg && cfg->virt) {
+ iounmap(cfg->virt + PCI_MMCFG_BUS_OFFSET(cfg->start_bus));
+ cfg->virt = NULL;
+ }
+}
+#endif
+
static u32
pci_mmconfig_generic_read(int len, void __iomem *addr)
{
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists