[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150526131950.GO3644@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 15:19:50 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
"Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/11] perf/x86: Improve HT workaround GP counter
constraint
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 04:47:11AM -0700, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> > I'm going to overhaul the whole get/put constraints stuff first.
>
> Ok, I think it would be good to balance to number of get/put. It would
> avoid the confusion. Is that what you are thinking about?
Yes, and remove the few associated modifications to events.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists