[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <556456A1.7030401@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 12:18:57 +0100
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: "Jon Medhurst (Tixy)" <tixy@...aro.org>
CC: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com>,
Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] firmware: add support for ARM System Control and
Power Interface(SCPI) protocol
On 20/05/15 12:17, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-05-14 at 16:42 +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>> This patch adds support for System Control and Power Interface (SCPI)
>> Message Protocol used between the Application Cores(AP) and the System
>> Control Processor(SCP). The MHU peripheral provides a mechanism for
>> inter-processor communication between SCP's M3 processor and AP.
>>
>> SCP offers control and management of the core/cluster power states,
>> various power domain DVFS including the core/cluster, certain system
>> clocks configuration, thermal sensors and many others.
>>
>> This protocol driver provides interface for all the client drivers using
>> SCPI to make use of the features offered by the SCP.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
>> CC: Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>
>> Cc: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>
>> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
>> Cc: Jon Medhurst (Tixy) <tixy@...aro.org>
>> ---
>
> Sorry for the delay in looking at this. I have one nitpick below but
> anyway, here's a
>
> Reviewed-by: Jon Medhurst (Tixy) <tixy@...aro.org>
>
Thanks!
> [...]
>> +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scpi.c
> [...]
>> +static void scpi_process_cmd(struct scpi_chan *ch, u32 cmd)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long flags;
>> + struct scpi_xfer *t, *match = NULL;
>> +
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&ch->rx_lock, flags);
>> + if (list_empty(&ch->rx_pending)) {
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ch->rx_lock, flags);
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + list_for_each_entry(t, &ch->rx_pending, node)
>> + if (CMD_XTRACT_UNIQ(t->cmd) == CMD_XTRACT_UNIQ(cmd)) {
>> + list_del(&t->node);
>> + match = t;
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + /* check if wait_for_completion is in progress or timed-out */
>> + if (match && !completion_done(&match->done)) {
>> + struct scpi_shared_mem *mem = ch->rx_payload;
>> + int len = min(match->rx_len, CMD_SIZE(cmd));
>> +
>> + match->status = le32_to_cpu(mem->status);
>> + memcpy_fromio(match->rx_buf, mem->payload, len);
>> + if (match->rx_len > len)
>
> rx_len is unsigned and len is signed and so I had to go refresh my
> memory from the C standard before I could convince myself that this if
> statement was OK. Might be clearer if len was unsigned, especially as
> it's the 'min' of two unsigned values.
>
Fixed locally for next version.
Regards,
Sudeep
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists